History Papers

Name: Bobby Montgomery
Location: Lubbock, Texas, United States

I am attending Lubbock Christian University and am a senior working towards my Bachelor of Science Interdisciplinary studies degree in Secondary education with an emphasis on Middle School Social Studies Compisition.

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Recent U.S. history Final Exam

Fall 2006
Final Exam
His4314 (Recent US) Name: BOBBY MONTGOMERY



What was the major domestic policy for the Reagan administration in 1981?

Reaganomics was a 0major domestic policy for the Reagan administration. Reagan thought that the ultimate source of all the damage to our economics was bloated government. “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” It was a “time to check and reverse the growth of government…” As president, he said, he would shift federal powers back to the states and to the people – where they belonged.[1]

What was the most serious foreign policy problem for the Reagan administration in 1981?

The most serious foreign policy problem that existed when Reagan became president was that of Communism. When Reagan took office he took the hard-line anti-communist approach. Reagan increased the defense budget and implemented plans of the Star Wars program. Reagan felt strongly about being anti-communist and it showed by his administration.[2]

What was most wrong with America according to Reagan’s 1980 campaign?

Reagan thought that bloated government was the biggest problem with America in 1980. Ironically, when Reagan took office he immediately began programs that increased the size of government to new levels.[3]

According to the supply-siders in the Reagan camp, what was the government action which most damaged the economy?

The supply-siders in the Reagan camp insisted that the Keynesian prodding of the economy to improve performance through demand-creating deficit spending was to blame for problems that damaged the economy.[4]

What was the leading liberal criticism of the Reagan administration?

Organized Labor was the leading liberal criticism of the Reagan administration. Partially due to the Unionized labor force and Pink collared workers. The use of machinery lowered the levels of blue collar jobs and more and more workers were pencil pushers. The pink collar workers stunted the growth of unions as well. Reagan felt little sympathy for Unions and did not care that unionized workers went from 22 % to 17% over the course of his presidency. [5]

According to Unger, what was the heart of the “Reagan Revolution?”

Anti-communism and defense were at the heart of the Reagan revolution. Reagan increased defense spending to unprecedented amounts during his presidency to help stop the spread of communism. Reagan implemented the “Star Wars” defense program and developed Intermediate Range Missiles. Reagan was anti-communist through and through and it showed by his actions.[6]

What was the major outcome of Reagan’s deregulation?

The major outcome of Reagan’s deregulation was the bust of the Savings and Loans. The government had to introduce the RTC or the Resolution Trust Corporation to help alleviate some of the debt of the S&L’s. They held auctions to the public to rid the S&L’s of their losses by selling off properties and other assets. In fact back in 1991 I personally bought my first home from an RTC auction. I paid $12,500.00 for the home that I still have as a rent house that is worth over $60,000.00.[7]


By what new element in the political coalition did the Republicans elect the president in 1980?

The Republicans elected President Reagan on that they could set a conservative tone through his presidency. Although when Reagan took office he set out to increase spending on defense.[8]

What was the most expensive item in the Reagan budget?

The most expensive item in Reagan’s budget was defense spending. Over the period of five years the defense spending would total to about 1.46 trillion. [9]

What was Reagan’s greatest foreign policy triumph?

Reagan’s greatest foreign policy triumph is that of the U.S. – Russian relations increased. This stemmed from Gorbachev taking over in Russia, he was not a hard-line Marxist and was not a big defender of the Russian Revolution. Gorbachev intended on restructuring or reforming Russia, with the uncertainty of “Star Wars” and the immense government spending on defense of the U.S. Gorachev agreed to meet with Reagan in 1987. Reagan and Gorbachev signed the INF treaty, that was a treaty in which both agreed to remove from Europe all the Intermediate Range Nuclear Missiles. [10]

During the first term, what was Reagan’s greatest foreign policy disaster?

Reagan’s greatest foreign policy disaster during his first term was Reagan and the Middle East when Reagan signed a secret agreement between the United States and Israel acknowledging that Israel does not need to leave Lebanon if the Syrian troops do not leave as well. No peace was achieved because of this agreement and Lebanon became to Israel as Vietnam was to the U.S. U.S. Marines were attacked because of the rising tension in the Middle East. Then a truck filled with High Explosives crashed into the U.S. Marine barracks near the Beirut Airport. The U.S. found itself in the midst of a Middle East Morass.[11]

What was the greatest failure of Reagan’s second term?

Iran Contra was the greatest failure of Reagan’s first administration. This where President Reagan found that U.S. citizens were being kidnapped by the Contra Rebels and in order to get the kidnapped back the president entered into an elaborate scheme of trading hostages for weapons. This was a violation of Federal Law. Reagan agreed to sell antitank missiles to Iran in order for the Iranians to influence the Contra Rebels to release the prisoners. This worked for a while but it resulted with more people being kidnapped. Arms for Hostages was an utter embarrassment for the president. [12]

Was Reagan correct when he promised “a brighter future for all our citizens”?

Reagan was incorrect when he made the promise of “a brighter future for all our citizens.” True the Cold War was coming to an end but our national debt increased immensely during his presidency. With all of the good that Reagan did during his presidency it was not without costs. I believe that the United States was a bit tarnished when we started negotiating with terrorists. [13]

What legislative measure did George H. W. Bush support which attracted praise from liberals?

I believe that Bush’s support of the abortion issue, which was a 180 degree turn around from his campaign, was sure to attract praise from the liberals. He appointed secretary of health and human services Dr. Louis Sullivan who had been a Pro-Choice defender. [14]

What was Reagan’s most controversial nomination to the Supreme Court in 1987?

Reagan’s most controversial nomination to the Supreme Court was Robert Bork. He was an outspoken man who had deeply offended many liberals. His nomination was denied.[15]

What was the difference between Bush’s environmental policy and his predecessor’s?

Reagan had little to do with the environment, however Bush on the other hand was deeply concerned about the environment. He chose Robert Reilly to head the EPA. There was a ban on asbestos and there were 93 wildlife refuges established. The Clean Air Act Ammendments of 1990 were of Bush’s greatest achievements concerning the environment.[16]

Were conservatives satisfied with Bush’s Supreme Court appointment?

Bush chose David Souter to succeed William Brennan. Souter was a conservative and was considered a man that was scholarly a reclusive. He was a man that led a sedate and irreproachable life. The conservatives were satisfied with this nomination.[17]

What was Bush’s worst political mistake?

Bush’s worst political mistake was Somalia. Somalia was damaging to American Pride and interests. Although Bush just lost re-election to the future President Clinton he started the last foreign venture of his presidency. To end the starvation in this country Bush sent in the U.S. Marines in 1992 under Operation Restore Hope. This was successful but President Clinton found that this was not cost free. [18]

Why did George H. W. Bush invade Iraq?

First the U.S. forces were already in Kuwait under Operation Desert Shield but in January of 1991. Saddam Hussein was advancing on the Kuawait border. Saddam was saying that he was prepared for the Mother of all wars and there was a belief that he would turn to germ warfare. In January of 91’ Bush concluded that the use of force was inevitable.[19]

What most effected Bush’s popularity after 1991?

I believe that what most effected Bush’s popularity was the fact that Bush stopped short of defeating Saddam. Although this was a U.N. decision the American people did not see things from the U. N. perspective. They thought as well as I did that if we were going to go over to fight Saddam then by all means we should seek to achieve our goal and not stop short of victory.[20]
[1] Unger 213
[2] Unger 228
[3] Unger 213
[4] Unger 213-214
[5] Unger 221-222
[6] Unger 235-237
[7] Unger 220
[8] Unger 211-212
[9] Unger 214
[10] Unger 249-252
[11] Unger 235
[12] Unger 240
[13] Personal Opinion
[14] Unger 257-258
[15] Unger 261
[16] Unger 261
[17] Unger 261
[18] Unger 274
[19] Unger 272
[20] My opinion

The U.S. involvement in Korea, During the Korean War: From the North Koreans Crossing the 38th Parallel to the End of McArthur

Bobby Montgomery
History of Asia


The U.S. involvement in Korea, During the Korean War:
From the North Koreans Crossing the 38th Parallel to the End of MacArthur



On June 25th 1950 the North Koreans crossed the 38th parallel and this caused the United Nations send troops to South Korea in order to stop the spread of communism. General Douglas MacArthur was appointed to be in charge of the U.N. troops. During his command he led the soldiers in several fierce battles. Towards his end of his command of the U.N. troops, in Korea, he made some comments about the communists and that he needed to attack other communist bases in Manchuria. For fear of causing a third World War, President Harry S. Truman relieved General MacArthur of his duties and replaced him with Matthew Ridgeway.
On August 10th, 1945, the U.S. and the Soviet Union determined to divide Korea at the 38th Parallel. The division of Korea was to have two separate areas of control.[1] The division of Korea, located on a peninsula on the southern coast of China was never planned to be a permanent one. This agreement was between the United States and the Soviet Union where each could establish their own form of government. South Korea was made democratic and North Korea was made communist. The South Koreans elected President Syngman Rhee and the North Korean’s were ruled by General Secretary Kim II-Sung. The North Koreans were more apt to be on the offensive.[2]
On August 6th 1945 the Soviets entered South Korea by way of the 38th parallel from the North. The United Nations agreed that they had enough of a reason and sent troops to the aid of South Korea. The President of the United States, Harry S. Truman, ordered a U.S. led invasion into South Korea. President Truman awarded General Douglas MacArthur the command of the U.N. troops in Korea. MacArthur was named the unified commander at the request of the United Nations.[3] This was the first time in the limited history of the United Nations for the United Nations to send in troops to fight a war. [4]
General MacArthur did not wish to waist any time so he went into the fight with his guns up and ready for a fight. The other western powers quickly agreed with the American actions and volunteered their support for the effort. The U.N assistance was not just limited to the United States but fifteen additional countries sent in troops to fight as well. These nations were Australia, Belgium, Canada, Columbia, Ethiopia, France, Great Britain, Greece, Luxemburg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines, Thailand, Turkey, the Union of South Africa and the United States. Five other nations did not send troops to Korea but did send in medical units.[5] By August of 1945 the South Korean soldiers and the U.S. Army were driven into a small area in the southeast corner of the Korean peninsula around the city of Pusan. Because of the American supplies, air support and additional reinforcements, the U.S. and South Korean troops were able to form a line of defense to stabilize a line along the Nakdong River. The Pusan Perimeter was a major defensive area that needed to be held. At times the fighting was fierce and it seemed that the Western soldiers could no longer go on. [6]
Although more UN support arrived, the situation was dire, and looked as though the North could gain control of the entire peninsula.
MacArthur ordered an amphibious invasion at Inchon, somewhere behind the North Koreans; this was in order to take some pressure off of Pusan. Inchon was a successful operation and there was very little resistance. The landing at Inchon aided in the recapture of Seoul Korea which is the capital of South Korea. When the North Koreans found that their supply lines were no longer functioning as they should rapidly retreated to the North. [7]
The invasion of South Korea by the North Koreans took the U.S. and its allies by surprise. Just weeks before the invasion, it was believed that no such war was going to happen. After the initial attack President Truman was contacted, he believed that the invasion was the beginning of World War III.[8]
The post-World War II demobilization of U.S. and allied forces caused serious supply problems for American troops in the region, with the exception of the marines, the infantry divisions sent to Korea were operating at an insufficient capacity. On paper they were not even showing to be very well equipped but in the field their equipment proved to be useless. At the beginning of the outbreak of war General Douglas MacArthur was in command of troops that were still in Japan. When President Truman heard of the invasion, he ordered MacArthur to transfer guns and equipment to Korea and to provide air support to protect the US citizens in which were evacuating. President Truman was advised to employ U.S. air strikes against the North Korean forces. However he did not agree with his advisors. Instead Truman ordered the protection of Taiwan by the seventh fleet. The Chinese Nationalists government asked to participate in the war, but their request was denied by the Americans who felt they would only encourage Communist Chinese intervention. This was probably due to the fact that the U.S. wanted to stop the spread of communism.[9]
The U.N. troops successfully drove the invading North Koreans past the 38th parallel. South Korea was saved however the U.N. approved the continuation of the fight to try to push the communists out of Korea and to set up democratic rule by Sygmann Rhee. The Chinese as well as Truman was worried that the fight may continue passed the Yalu River and on into China. Truman told MacArthur that on his approach to the border of China that he should be very cautious. MacArthur was in total disagreement with Truman because the North Koreans were being supplied by the Chinese, warranting the bombing of these Chinese bases in China as well. For the most part the U.S. and the rest of the U.N. troops stayed out of China during the Korean War.[10]
When the U.S troops crossed the 38th parallel on October 7th, 1950, Mao Zedong ordered the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to be ready at the Yalu River, and they were made ready the very next day. . Truman thought of this as a way to blackmail the United Nations. Mao sought the aid of the Soviets, he saw this as a purely defensive move: "If we allow the U.S. to occupy all of Korea… we must be prepared for the US to declare… war with China"[11], Mao delayed his forces while waiting for the Russians to render aid. Mao had to postpone his attack by one week, to October 19th 1950. The Soviets offered limited resources of aid. They offered limited air support but was for no closer than sixty miles from the front lines. The Soviets had air superiority to the smaller UN planes. To avoid any international nuclear incidents the U.S. kept the Soviet involvement quiet.[12]
Truman wanted to limit the possibility of Chinese involvement in the war and so he met with MacArthur on Wake Island on October 15, 1950. MacArthur reassured to Truman that "if the Chinese tried to get down to Pyongyang there would be the greatest slaughter." [13] Truman did not wish to see the Chinese get involved in the war for fear of World War III. The Chinese intervening in the war was inevitable.
The Chinese began to assist the North Koreans on October 25, 1950; they were under the command of General Peng Dehuai. The Chinese sent in approximately 270,000 troops to the aid of North Korea. The assault that the Chinese led was a complete surprise to the U.N. troops. The Chinese showed great skill in their fighting technique and very clever at camouflaging themselves so well that their strength in numbers went unknown. The Chinese withdrew into the mountains after the initial assault. The U.N. forces ignored the Chinese and the warning that they gave and continued to proceed to the Yalu River. The Chinese did not strike again until later in the year by the Chongchon River. The Chinese were able to outflank the U.N. troops. The result of this attack was the withdrawal of the Eighth Army Division. This ended up being a long retreat that totaled to be the longest in the history of an American force.[14]
Seoul Korea was recaptured on January 4th 1951 by the North Koreans with the aid of the Chinese. This once again caused the Eight Army to retreat along with others. The commander of the Eighth army, General Walker, was killed and he was replaced with Lieutenant General Matthew Ridgeway. Ridgeway led an airborne assault during World War II. The morale of the Eighth Army was lacking and so Lieutenant General Ridgeway wanted to raise their morale and immediately took steps to achieve this. The situation was still not looking that good and MacArthur made mention that nuclear weapons should be used. This did not sit well with many of the allies that were with the U.N. Despite MacArthur’s suggestion of nuclear attack Lt. Gen. M. Ridgeway was able to get the Eighth army ready to fight. Ridgeway led the Eighth Army in Operation Ripper where they were successful in their attempt to retake Seoul Korea. [15]
Because of MacArthur’s suggestion of nuclear attack and his demeanor after the suggestion was not taken. MacArthur was relieved from command by President Truman on April 11, 1951. There are many reasons for this are many and well documented. They include a meeting that MacArthur had with Chiang Kai Shek; he also furnished some bad information to the President, at Wake Island. The big thing was his demanding a nuclear attack on the Chinese. MacArthur was succeeded by Ridgway, who managed to regroup UN forces for an effective counter-offensive. A series of attacks managed to slowly drive back the opposing forces.[16]
[1] Korean Civil War, http://www.tagate.com/wars/page/korean.shtml
[2] Andrew Geer, The New Breed: The Story of the U.S. Marines in Korea, New York, NY Harper Brothers Publishers 1952, 90
[3] Don Lawson, The United States in the Korean War, New York, NY Abelard-Schuman Limited Publishers 1964, 39
[4] Michael Schaller, Douglas MacArthur: The Far East General, Oxford, NY Oxford University Press 1989, 190-191
[5] Don Lawson, The United States in the Korean War, New York, NY Abelard-Schuman Limited Publishers 1964, 41
[6] Don Lawson, The United States in the Korean War, New York, NY Abelard-Schuman Limited Publishers 1964, 45-46
[7] Andrew Geer. THE NEW BREED: THE STORY OF THE U.S. MARINES IN KOREA, New York, NY Harper Brothers Publishers, 1952 121-140
[8] Korean Civil War, http://www.tagate.com/wars/page/korean.shtml
[9] Michael Hickey, The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism, New York, NY. The Overlook Press 2000, 38
[10] Trumbull Higgins, Korea and the Fall of MacArthur, NewYork, NY. Oxford University Press 1960, 106

[11] Korean Civil War, http://www.tagate.com/wars/page/korean.shtml
[12] Michael Hickey, The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism, New York, NY. The Overlook Press 2000, 106
[13] Korean Civil War, http://www.tagate.com/wars/page/korean.shtml
[14] Michael Hickey, The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism, New York, NY. The Overlook Press 2000, 122-124
[15] Michael Hickey, The Korean War: The West Confronts Communism, New York, NY. The Overlook Press 2000, 234-235
[16] Michael Schaller, Douglas MacArthur: The Far East General, Oxford, NY Oxford University Press 1989, 238

The Western Influence on the Chinese: and the Role they played in putting down the Boxer Rebellion

Bobby Montgomery
History of Asia



The Western Influence on the Chinese:
And the Role they Played in Putting Down the Boxer Rebelion


The Boxer rebellion is a rebellion in which was led by a secret society group known as the I Ho Ch’uan or the Fists of Righteous Amity. [1] This group was called boxers by the westerners due to their use of martial arts and their use of traditional Chinese weaponry. This rebellion began because the Boxers were anti-western and did not want China to be influenced by the west any longer. The Chinese were being influenced by the Americans as well as by several other nations from the west.
The west was largely trying to influence the Chinese because the west was relying on the Chinese for trade. America and Britain agreed to an Open Door Policy on trade with China and the younger generation of Chinese was opposed to it. It was this younger generation of Chinese that formed the secret society known as the boxers. This group swore an allegiance to the cause of ending western influence. They began killing Chinese Christians and any foreign people that they found. They then took Peking under siege ant this is when the Western troops came in to relieve this uprising of the boxers.[2]
The Americans had a large part in putting down the boxer rebellion largely in part by the Marines commanded by Marine Captain John Myers, otherwise known as Handsome Jack Myers.[3] The Americans sent in about one hundred troops to begin with. But the Americans were not the only country that supported this effort in putting down the boxer rebellion. The British and the Australians as well as other countries joined in on the effort.
The United States Marines however did play a vital role in putting down the boxer rebellion. The Marines first arrived to China after the foreign legations telegraphed for help. The U.S. Marines were in the Asiatic and set their course to North China. The first to arrive was the USS Newark, they landed forty miles from Tientsin. The Newark deployed forty-eight marines that were commanded by Captain John Myers. Later they were joined by sixty additional sailors. In order to sail up the coast to Tientsen the troops commandeered a steam boat. Upon their arrival in Tientsen the troops were met by a foreign brass band. The people seemed to be ecstatic and received the troops joyfully.[4]
The troops from the other countries all were greeted much like the American troops. They were all joyfully accepted. One of the men that received the troops was Mr. Herbert Hoover, he later stated, “I do not remember a more satisfying musical performance than the bugles of the American Marines entering the settlement playing, There’ll Be a Hot Time in the Old Town Tonight.” This was the overall excitement of the troops coming from all of the allied nations. They were all met with equal excitement and were a welcomed sight. [5]
Once the troops arrived at Tientsen it could be clearly seen that the troops needed to push through to Peking, due to the siege of that city. The troops massed together, about twenty-five hundred men, and got onboard two trains bound for Peking. The station master of the trains reluctantly handed them over the trains. Captain John Myers was reported saying “The dense mass which thronged either side of the roadway seemed more ominous than a demonstration of hostility would have been.” The troops gathered were an enormous force.[6]
The Boxers had cut off the railroads between Tientsen and Peking and demolished portions of the rail line. The marines and the allies were cut off from Peking yet Captain McCalla of the U.S.S. Newark told the other senior officers of the allied nations “I don’t care what the rest of you do. I have one hundred twelve men here and I’m going tomorrow morning to the rescue of my own flesh and blood in Peking. I’ll be damned if I sit here ninety miles away and just wait.” The following day Captain McCalla and Admiral Seymour, commander of the British Marines, started out for Peking. They were going to repair the railroad and push on through to Peking. There was only one man with them that seemed to know how to repair the railroad. That man was a U.S. Navy coal passer. He knew how to set a fishplate and to spike down a rail. The trains and the troops made it to just twenty-five miles from Peking and had to turn back due to the boxers were pushing them back. The western troops left behind the trains and retreated back to Tientsen due to the outnumbering boxer troops and the heavy hail of fire that they were coming under. For four days Captain McCalla and Admiral Seymour journeyed back to Tientsen with their troops. The men were pounded by Boxers with every day that went by. [7]
Over the course of the next few months the allied troops along side the Americans built up their forces to some, twenty thousand men, and two thousand of these men were Americans. Though the fighting was fierce and the damage was massive the western troops were able to push their way into Peking and successfully took the city. They pushed the Boxers from their hold of the city of Peking.[8] Over the course of several months the Westerners built up their stronghold of Peking and spread through parts of China putting down the remaining Boxer groups in the area.
On February 1st of 1901 the Chinese government agreed to abolish the Boxer Society, or I Ho Ch’uan. September 7th was the day that the Peace Protocol of Peking was signed between the Chinese government and the Allied nations. The United States was a large part of the relief of the Boxer rebellion, largely in part because there were many ships in the Asiatic left over from the Spanish American War and other activity around the Philippines. One of the great things that resulted out of the Boxer Rebellion was the American feeling that the Philippines were greatly needed to hold onto in the East.[9]
The Americans and the other western nations that played a role in putting down the Boxer rebellion did so for selfish reasons. All be it that it was for the best as far as trying to keep relations with the Chinese fluid and trying to keep the Germans from initiating trade with the Chinese by partitioning the country so that we could only trade in certain areas. The reason was still selfish in part as far as we did not want to lose our foothold with the Chinese. The Role that the west played in putting down the rebellion was one that the Chinese government could not do in and of itself.
[1] Chester Tan, The Boxer Catastrophe, New York, NY Columbia University Press 1955, 37
[2] The American Soldier. http://www.army.mil/CMH-PG/art/P-P/as-5/1900.htm
2. Richard O’Connor, The Spirit Soldiers: A Historical Narrative of the Boxer Rebellion, New York, NY G.P. Putman and Son’s Publishing 1973,58-60

[4] Ibid, 57
[5] Prologue Magazine, Winter 1999, Vol. 31 No. 4 Trevor K. Plante US Marines in the Boxer Rebellion
[6] Ibid
[7] . Richard O’Connor, The Spirit Soldiers: A Historical Narrative of the Boxer Rebellion, New York, NY G.P. Putman and Son’s Publishing 1973,105-110
[8] Prologue Magazine, Winter 1999, Vol. 31 No. 4 Trevor K. Plante US Marines in the Boxer Rebellion
[9] Christopher Martin, The Boxer Rebellion, New York, NY Abelard-Schuman Publishing 1968, 154-160

From Scipio to Africanus: the Making of a Hero

Bobby Montgomery
Ancient History



From Scipio to Africanus: the Making of a Hero



Publius Cornelius Scipio the Younger may have just been a mortal man, however during the Second Punic War, his actions are what transformed him into the hero, Scipio Africanus. His major enemy was Hannibal of Carthage. The defeat of Hannibal at Carthage was what Publius Cornelius Scipio the Younger was best known for, and earned him the title (or agnomen) of Africanus. As a military commander for the Roman army, he led his troops into several battles and he even served as a statesman for the Roman Republic.
Born in Rome 235 BC, Publius Cornelius Scipio the Younger was a member of one of the most prominent families at that time in Rome, the Scipione family. In his lineage several of his ancestors were consuls for Rome and his great-grandfather had even served as patrician censor in 280 BC. The Scipiones were the most distinctive branch of the five major patrician families of this time. Scipio was the oldest son of Publius Cornelius Scipio who was also praetor and consul. When Scipio was still quite young - 24 years of age - he decided to run for the office of curule audile. He won, despite opposition by the Senate and this made Scipio the youngest man to ever serve on the Senate. [1]
During the Second Punic War, Rome was at war with the Carthaginians. Scipio joined the Roman army. At some point Scipio had promised his father that he would continue the fight against Carthage even after his father’s death. Scipio fought in many battles against Carthage: the Battle of Ticinus, the Battle of Baecula, and the Battle of Illipa. Scipio was able to put the Carthaginians on the run and then was able to defeat the Carthaginians and Hannibal at the Battle of Zama.[2]
The battle of Ticinus was a battle fought during the Second Punic War between the Romans, led by Publius Cornelius Scipio the Elder and the Carthaginian forces, led by Hannibal. The army led by Scipio was sent to stop the Carthaginian advance on Spain. Apparently they crossed paths without coming into contact with one another around the Rhone River. Scipio (the Younger and future Africanus) was present in this battle, but his father wanted his son only to watch from the sidelines. Therefore, his father placed him in command of a handpicked group of cavalry troops and placed them on a small hill out of harm’s way. In the midst of battle, Scipio, the Younger, saw that his father was injured and was surrounded with little hope; he charged the battlefield to assist his father. Scipio saved his father’s life, and when the news of his heroism traveled back to the consul, the consul wished to give Scipio the Younger a civic crown. However Scipio the Younger turned the crown away and said “the action was one that rewarded itself.”[3] This battle was fought November of 218 BC, and it was the first of the battles to take place in Italy. Scipio continued his advance to Spain to wipe out the remaining Carthaginian forces there. The Battle of Ticinus showed that the Romans had a superior cavalry to the Carthaginians.[4]
Back in Rome, Scipio the Younger, heard that some of the younger patricians were saying that they were going to flee Rome, and so the consuls began to deliberate this. Scipio reacted and told the council “that it is not a proper subject for deliberation; that courage and action, not deliberation, were necessary in such a calamity. That those who desired the safety of the state would attend him in arms fore with; that in no place was the camp of the enemy more truly than where such designs are meditated.” Then by the sword, Scipio told of his purpose to the men of the council seeking to retreat. Scipio told these men that “I swear that I will neither desert the cause of Rome, nor will I allow any other citizen of Rome to desert it.”[5]
Since Scipio was very popular with the people of Rome, when his brother Lucius was running for the office of the aedile, he decided to run alongside his brother, to help his chances of winning. Scipio knew that Lucius was not a very popular candidate, and had little chance of winning on his own, so Scipio decided to help him out, while putting him in a stronger position to fight the war. Scipio told his mother of his plan that he had been dreaming of to become aedile; when she heard of it she was ecstatic. With her approval, Scipio ran for Aedile and the people overwhelmingly elected him as well as Lucius. When everyone had heard that Scipio dreamed of becoming aedile the people thought that Scipio must really communicate with the gods. According to Livy, Scipio made certain that the people continued to believe that he spoke with the gods by “never engaging in any business, public or private, without first paying a visit to the capitol. There he would enter the sanctuary… … in solitude and seclusion,” Scipio won but there were really no dreams of being aedile at all. Scipio had such a desire for power that he lied about the dreams. The Romans were still involved in the Second Punic War; Scipio desired power to aid him at putting down the Carthaginian insurrection.[6]
The Roman army continued to fight in Spain, against the Carthaginians; they started winning the battles that they were fighting in Spain. They had massacred the majority of the Carthaginian forces that they were fighting in Spain. Scipio and his army had captured more than ten thousand men in which all of the citizens of New Carthage were set free and given back all of their possessions. Not only were all the prisoners released, there was a beautiful woman that the Roman soldiers took and saved for Scipio. Scipio enjoyed the company of beautiful women, and when he found out that this woman was betrothed to a Celt Iberian chief, he returned her safely to the chief. The chief was impressed with Scipio and his honorable deed and thus sent a cavalry of 1400 strong, including himself, to aid in the fight against the Carthaginians. [7]
As the battles progressed, the Roman legions continually managed to put the Carthaginians on the run. The battle of Baecula that Scipio took the initiative and advanced on the Carthaginians, while they were still in their winter quarters. Scipio advanced even farther, and found that Hasdrubal, Hannibal’ brother, was nicely fortified, on a plateau. Scipio decided to go on the defensive, to take on Hasdrubal and his army. Scipio was able to send his velites (or light infantry) up the side of the plateau despite the hail of projectiles that were being tossed at the Romans, by the Carthaginians. With the Roman army continually advancing, and the more advanced weaponry of the Romans, they were able to push the enemy back even farther. Scipio sent the rest of the men to outflank the enemy and was able to successfully take the plateau. Hasdrubal managed to slip away and as a decisive move Scipio chose not to follow at that time.[8]
Scipio ordered that the African prisoners be sold off as slaves, but the crowd of Spanish infantry and cavalry, about twelve thousand strong, were released. The newly released Spanish men began to hail Scipio as their ‘king,’ and so Scipio told them that he was not their ‘king’ and that they should call him ‘general.’[9] There was a second time that Scipio chose to release a prisoner of war and this was when a slave trader found a young boy, who belonged to a royal family, and sent him to Scipio. The boys name was Massiva. His uncle was Masinissa, who was assisting the Carthaginians by letting them use his cavalry. The boy was captured because he had disobeyed his uncle, and tried to join the fight at too early of an age. Scipio, being kindhearted, asked the boy if he would like to return to his uncle, and the boy un-undoubtedly said yes. Scipio gave the boy a horse, supplies, and guaranteed him a safe journey home.[10] The Carthaginian’s last great push in Spain was at the battle of Illipa. At this battle, Mago, another of Hannibal’s brothers, trained a fresh army of men that were seventy two thousand strong, and consisted of four thousand cavalry, to the Romans only having fifty thousand infantry and forty five hundred cavalry. Hasdrubal began the advance on Illipa, which is probably located at Alcala’ Del Rio, while the Roman army was setting up camp. However, Scipio was not surprised and was able to beat off the Carthaginians by sending the Roman cavalry after them. This fight lasted for several days, although the main battle was yet to come. Scipio waited to deploy the bulk of the Roman army until, several days later, early in the morning, when Scipio felt that the Carthaginian soldiers would not have sufficient time to eat their morning meal. Finally, Scipio was able to outflank the Carthaginian forces of Mago. First the elephants took their toll, and then the infantry and cavalry began to suffer. The following day, the Carthaginian Spanish allies slipped out of camp and take off, not to return to this fight. This caused Hasdrubal to retreat the next day; he retreated because he had insufficient numbers of cavalry and infantry to win. This battle was not finished, but was a victory for the Roman army. The Battle of Illipa was one of Scipio’s most intricate battles. Polybius felt that this battle was important enough to write a detailed account of it. This battle showed that the Roman army finally learned to move as a single unit, and to move in unison with each other.[11]
Scipio was actively in pursuit of the Carthaginians; however Hasdrubal himself managed to escape to the hills and then slipped to the coast and went to Gades. Masinissa, another one of the Carthaginian allied commanders, also was able to escape. Scipio and his men followed after Masinissa and Hannibal, by ship. Scipio sent Laelius to Hippo Regius, which sat around one hundred and fifty miles from Carthage. According to Livy, Laelius’ troops went on raids of the local farms and the damage was very high. Livy wrote “People brought the alarming news to Carthage, filling the city with sheer terror: a Roman fleet had arrived, they said, and with it the commander Scipio.” With the news of a Roman invasion, there was a shift in power: Masinissa and his men abandoned Hannibal, Mago showed no signs of helping Hannibal, and Syphax. This shift in power caused Hannibal to grow even weaker and his popularity began to diminish. It caused Hannibal try to re-establish relationships as well as form new ones.[12]
Mago came down to help Hannibal after all, “sending twenty-five war ships, six thousand infantry, eight hundred cavalry, seven elephants and a large sum of money to hire mercenaries.” Hannibal was able to build up a few allies and get his army pulled together. Some of Hannibal’s old allies took the opportunity to join the Roman army. [13]
Masinissa was one of Hannibal’s long time allies and he had recently left Hannibal’s side, when he had heard that Scipio was leading an invasion against Carthage. Masinissa came up to Laelius, while gathering up his booty he took from the Carthaginians. Masinissa told Laelius of all that was taking place in Carthage and that Scipio did not need to hold anything back in this fight against Hannibal. Masinissa told Laelius that even though Hannibal lost some allies that he was forming new ones.[14]
Scipio had a few setbacks, the biggest being that there was uneasiness in Locri. Locri was the last Carthaginian stronghold there in Italy. Upon this word, Scipio set sail back to Locri to rid the Italians of the Carthaginians. Scipio needed to free Locri from Carthaginian rule. Hannibal had reinforced the position at Locri; however, Scipio managed to outflank and to confuse the Carthaginians. Hannibal and his men retreated back to Carthage. This was the last Carthaginian hold in Italy. Scipio’s surprise attack and the ability to outflank the Carthaginians under the command of Hannibal was a great victory for the Romans who were commanded by Scipio. This victory boosted the morale of the Roman soldiers.[15]
When Scipio traveled back to Rome to plead to the Senate for approval for the African campaign, he met with the Senate members at the temple of Balona, and told them of all his dealings with the Carthaginians in Spain. He was thus rewarded with the title of consul, named by all of the centuries, because he was victorious in the Spanish wars. Although he was denied his “triumph” in the city by the Senate, he was still able to enjoy the title of consul. Scipio was assured that he was not given the title of consul just to prosecute criminals but to finish the war that was started long ago against Carthage. Scipio was already figuring out how to get back to Africa, even without the Senate’s approval, and he determined that if necessary he could use the people’s support and get to Africa without the Senate’s approval, if necessary.[16]
When Scipio went to the Senate to gain approval, to take his fight to Carthage, Senator Fabius Cuncator was very cautious. He pointed out that Carthage was not a consular province, and thus should not be invaded. Then Scipio listened to Fabius as he told of all that he had done, and he did this to curtail Scipio from using his high achievement to better his position. Ultimately, Fabius wanted Scipio to fight Hannibal in Italy and not in Carthage. Fabius told Scipio that he would face multitudes of problems if he took the fight to Africa; there was no open harbor, no allies in Carthage, and no foothold already in the country. Fabius made a strong impression on the Senate, who was clearly against anything Scipio could further say to improve his position on the matter.[17]
When Scipio replied to the Senate, he told the Senate how he felt that Fabius was not looking out for the state, but only for the safety of Scipio:


Even Quintus Fabius himself has observed… that in the opinion he gave a feeling of jealousy might be suspected. And though I dare not myself charge so great a man with harbouring that feeling, yet, whether it is owing to a defect in his phrasing, or to the fact, that suspicion has certainly not been removed. For he has so magnified his own honours and the fame of his exploits, to do away with the imputation of envy, that it would appear I am in danger of being rivalled by every obscure person, because he enjoys an eminence above everybody else….” “He has represented himself as an old man, and as one who has gone through very graduation of honour, and me as below the age of his son, as if he supposed the desire of glory did not exceed the span of his life, and as if its chief part had no respect to memory and future ages.[18]



Scipio went on to say that Fabius made no mention of the fights that Scipio had faced in Spain and in Italy against the Carthaginians. Scipio told of all of the victories and the defeats that made Scipio into the ‘general’ that he was. Scipio ended his appeal to the Senate with the following:


Though Fabius has depreciated my services in Spain, I will not attempt to turn his glory into ridicule and magnify my own. If nothing else, though as a young man, I will show my superiority over this old man in modesty and in the government of my tongue. Such has been my life, and such services I have performed, that I can rest my content in silence with that opinion which you have spontaneously formed of me.[19]



Scipio’s appeal to the Senate did little good. The Senate wanted Scipio’s word that, whatever that they would decide, Scipio would abide by that ruling. Scipio conferred with his colleague and would not leave them his word. Essentially the Senate and Scipio formed a compromise and Scipio went to Sicily to gain their permission to cross into Africa. Sicily conceded to Scipio, so he brought with him thirty warships and set sail to Africa.[20] While in Sicily, Scipio raised an army to go on into Africa. Scipio also formed a large cavalry by ordering the Sicilians to either join the cavalry or to pay for a horse and equipment and to provide for somebody to ride in their place. When the Roman Senate found out that Scipio then commanded a sizeable army, cavalry, and fleet, they reluctantly agreed to send Scipio and his army to Africa. He was given permission but the Romans would not yet financially support this operation.
In 204 BC, Scipio sailed some forty warships and four hundred transports with enough supplies for forty five days to Carthage. Landing just a couple of miles from Utica (in Carthage) Scipio took the initiative to secure Utica as a base of operations. Scipio was met by Masinissa, he had brought with him two hundred of his cavalry. Misinissa had promised Scipio that he would join the fight against Hannibal. Scipio and his men were met by an opposing party of five hundred Carthaginian cavalry. With the aid of Masinissa’s cavalry, Scipio was able to lure the Carthaginian general Hanno into a full scale fight, and thus the Romans were able to take the city of Utica for their base of operations. [21]
Scipio was in several battles while in Africa but none of them compared to the battle of Zama. Scipio had a total army of around forty three thousand men. Scipio’s consisted of fourteen thousand light infantry and eighty seven hundred cavalry (six thousand of which were Numidian that Masinissa brought to fight with the Romans). Scipio was accompanied by four legions of men. Hannibal’s cavalry was weaker than usual and outnumbered by the Romans.[22]
At this battle even though Hannibal was weak in cavalry, he was very strong in the numbers of elephants that he had in his arsenal. The use of over eighty elephants on Hannibal’s front line put Hannibal in a very strong tactical position. Hannibal hoped that this would be enough to break Scipio’s front line.[23] In order for Scipio to overcome Hannibal’s strong position, Scipio set his troops in Maniples, straight lines, and not in the typical echelon formation, like a series of steps or a checkerboard. This gave Scipio a strong edge over Hannibal and his troops.[24] Scipio also employed the use of his trumpeters to confuse the elephants. When the trumpets were sounded the elephants went stampeding back, to the Numidian line. Then, Masinissa’s troops fired a hail of darts, which caused the elephants and cavalry of the Carthaginian’s to charge off of the battle field, Masinissa’s cavalry followed.[25] Because the cavalry left the battle field the infantry had to fight amongst themselves, Hannibal found his army without any Cavalry to support it.[26] The battle was a bloody one that left both sides equally hurt. During the battle, Scipio realized that his front line was weaker, so he strengthened it “by closing the intervals of the maniples of the first line on the center.”[27] In this battle the Romans were able to fight in unison, unlike the Carthaginian forces who were disorganized. According to Livy…


On the part of the Romans the shout was uniform, and on that account louder and more terrific; while the voices of the enemy, consisting as they did of many nations of different languages, were dissonant. The Romans used the stationary kind of fight, pressing upon the enemy with their own weight and that of their own arms; but on the other side there was more of skirmishing and rapid movement than force.[28]

The Roman infantry managed to get rid of one the battle fronts of the Carthaginians by the fierce fighting and overpowering the Carthaginians. The Romans found themselves on top of the fight and began to march toward the Carthaginian veterans who had not yet fought in battle.
Scipio found that the Roman army was winning the initial battle, so Scipio took the time to regroup his men. While Scipio was still regrouping the men, Hannibal started to advance. His troops were in the phalanx position, a rectangular mass military formation. Scipio was in a far greater position as far as the number of men, but Scipio was still placing his men in formation. Scipio had only lost a couple of thousand men while Hannibal was down to about twenty four thousand men. With the fierce fighting around him, Scipio was about to be overwhelmed, due to the lack of formation; however, the cavalry rejoined the fight, led by Masinissa and Laelius. Because of the cavalry reinforcement, the Carthaginians found themselves at a coup de grace – in other words, “no courage, no genius on an open plain, could turn the tide of victory”[29]
With the return of the cavalry, the Battle of Zama was swiftly won by Scipio and the Roman army. Livy estimates that there were only two thousand Roman casualties during this battle and that the Carthaginians losses were far greater at more than twenty five thousand men. With the Carthaginian loss at the Battle of Zama, they were quick to cede. Scipio had several terms for the Carthaginians before he would accept their secession. The terms were as follows: to make reparation for violating the truce, give up all but ten warships and all of the elephants, free all of the prisoners, agree to no wars outside of Africa without Roman permission, restore Masinissa to the Carthaginian throne, give three months provisions to the Roman army, pay two hundred talents to Rome for fifty years, and give up one hundred hostages to Rome. The surrender of Hannibal was not demanded because he had fled the country and could not be found. Later Hannibal returned to Carthage and was elected chief magistrate there.[30]
When Scipio was handing out the order of what the Carthaginians must due for Rome in light of the Roman victory, Scipio was said to be all too easy on the Carthaginians. Scipio set the terms and allowed Hannibal to be the civic leader of Carthage. Cato raised allegations that Scipio was going to be easy on Carthaginians and that he had a hidden agenda. No hidden agenda was ever proved.
Because of Scipio’s victory in the Second Punic War and the fact that he was able to defeat the Carthaginians, he was given his Triumph which was denied to him previously.


Everyone in the procession wore crowns. Trumpeters led the advance, and wagons laden with spoils. Towers were borne along representing the captured cities, and pictures illustrating the campaigns; then gold and silver coin and bullion, and similar captured materials; then came the crowns presented to the general as a reward for his bravery by cities, by allies, or by the army itself. White oxen came next, and after them elephants and the captive Carthaginian and Numidian leaders. Lictors wearing purple tunics preceding the general; also a chorus of harpists and pipers – in imitation of an Etruscan procession, wearing a body-length purple cloak as well as gold bracelets and necklace, caused laughter by making various gesticulations, as though he were dancing in triumph over the enemy. Next came a number of incense-bearers and after them the general himself in a richly decorated chariot.

He wore a crown of gold and precious stones, and was dressed, in traditional fashion, in a purple toga woven with golden stars. He carried a scepter of ivory, and a laurel branch, which is invariably the Roman symbol for victory. Riding in the same chariot with him were boys and girls, and –on the trace horses either side of him – young men, his own relatives. Then followed the men who served him on campaign as secretaries, aides and armor bearers. After these came the army itself marshaled in squadrons and cohorts, all of them crowned and carrying laurel branches, the bravest of them bearing their military prizes. The men praised some of their officers, and ridiculed or criticized others; during a triumph there are no restrictions, and everybody can say whatever they like. When Scipio arrived at the Capitol the procession came to an end, and he hosted the traditional banquet for his friends in the temple.[31]



Scipio received the agnomen, or title, of Africanus because he conquered Carthage in Africa. He was the first general who was distinguished by a name derived from the country which he had conquered.”[32] He was almost lifted up to seemingly be a god. Scipio was offered to be Tribune and said that he should have no such great honor. According to Livy, Scipio…

hindered statues being erected to him in the comitium, in the rostrum, in the Senate house, in the Capitol, in the chapel of Jupiter’s temple, and that he prevented a decree being passed that his image, in a triumphal habit, should be brought in procession out of the temple of Jupiter… would demonstrate an uncommon greatness of mind, in limiting his honours conformably with his position as a citizen.[33]



Scipio did not want to have such great power or to be exalted as a god or king, so Scipio turned down the opportunity to be Tribune. Scipio was later elected to be Censor in 199 BC, and he did not fight in any battles after this.





















Notes

[1] B. H. Liddell Hart, Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon (Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 1926), 12-14
[2]. Rossi, Andreola. 2004. Parallel Lives: Hannibal and Scipio in Livy’s Third Decade. Transactions of the American Philogical Associaton 359
[3] UNRV History, Rise of Scipio and Fall of New Carthage. http://www.unrv.com/empire/fall-of-carthage.php.
[4] J.F. Lazenby, Hannibal’s War: a Military History of the Second Punic War (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press), 53
[5] Ibid., 54
[6] B. H. Liddell Hart, Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon (Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 1926), 14-17
[7] Ibid., 41
[8] Hoyos, Dexter, Hannibal’s Dynasty ( London, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2003), 144
[9] Tiberius Livy, Hannibal’s War vol. 21-30 (Oxford, NY: University of Oxford Press, 2006), 406
[10] B. H. Liddell Hart, Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon (Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 1926),
52-53
[11] J.F. Lazenby, Hannibal’s War: a Military History of the Second Punic War (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1978), 145-150
[12] Tiberius Livy, Hannibal’s War vol. 21-30 ( Oxford, NY: University of Oxford Press, 2006), 518
[13] Ibid., 519
[14] Ibid., 520-521
[15] B. H. Liddell Hart, Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon (Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 1926), 106-109
[16] The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. VIII. 96
[17] Rossi, Andreola. 2004. Parallel Lives: Hannibal and Scipio in Livy’s Third Decade. Transactions of the American Phillogical Association. 378
[18] . H. Liddell Hart, Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon (Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 1926), 93
[19] Ibid., 95
[20] Ibid., 97
[21] Rossi, Andreola. 2004. Parallel Lives: Hannibal and Scipio in Livy’s Third Decade. Transactions of the American Philogical Associaton, 374
21 Theodore Ayrault Dodge, Hannibal (Boston, MA: De Capo Press, 1891), 600
[23] Ibid., 600
[24] John Peddie, Hannibal’s War (Hong Kong, China: Sutton Publishing, 1997), 119
[25] G. P. Baker, Hannibal (New York, NY: Barnes and Noble, Inc. 1967), 268-270
[26] Theodore Ayrault Dodge, Hannibal (Boston, MA: De Capo Press, 1891), 603
[27] Ibid., 604
[28] Ibid., 604
[29] Ibid., 609
[30] Tiberius Livy, Hannibal’s War vol. 21-30 ( Oxford, NY: University of Oxford Press, 2006), 712
[31] Boatwright, Mary T., Gargola, Daniel J., Talbert, and Richard J. A., The Romans: From Village to Empire. (Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press 2004), 101
[32] . H. Liddell Hart, Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon (Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 1926), 200
[33] Ibid 201









Bibliography

Baker, G. P., Hannibal. New York: Barnes and Noble Booksellers, 1967

The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. VIII.

Dodge, Theodore Ayrault. Hannibal. Boston, MA: De Capo Press, 1891

Hart, B. H. Liddell, Scipio Africanus: Greater Than Napoleon. Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 1926

Hoyos, Dexter, Haniball’s Dynasty. London: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2003

Lazenby, J.F., Hannibal’s War: a Military History of the Second Punic War . Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press

Livy, Tiberius, Hannibal’s War vol. 21-30 . Oxford, NY: University of Oxford Press, 2006

Peddie, John, Hannibal’s War . Hong Kong, China: Sutton Publishing, 1997

Rossie, Andreola, Parallel Lives: Hannibal and Scipio in Livy’s Third Decade. Transactions of the American Phillogical Association. 2006

UNRV HISTORY UNRV History, Rise of Scipio and Fall of New Carthage. http://www.unrv.com/empire/fall-of-carthage.php.

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Recent America Test 2

Bobby Montgomery
Recent America test #2
October 22, 2006


John Maynard Keynes – Was an English economist that had a major impact on modern economic and political theory as well as the governments' fiscal policy. His popular expression "In the very long run we are all dead" is still quoted.
LBJ used the Keynesian techniques of fine tuning taxation and the federal spending. This helped to bring a better quality of life to the American peoples.

Apollo Program – The Apollo program was the program that NASA used to beat the Russians in the space race. It was a series of manned space flights that was devoted to landing a man on the moon and in July of 1969 Apollo 11 successfully landed two men on the moon using the Saturn launch vehicle. The men successfully returned back to Earth.

“Freedom Riders” – The Freedom Riders were a group of men and women mainly African American however they were from many different backgrounds and ethnicities who boarded buses and headed to the South to challenge the 1960 U.S. Supreme Court ruling outlawing segregation in all public facilities.

Robert Kennedy –Robert Francis "Bobby" Kennedy (November 20, 1925 – June 6, 1968), was one of the younger brothers to John F. Kennedy. He worked closely with the President during the Cuban Missile Crisis but his contribution to the African-American Civil Rights Movement is his greatest contribution.

SCLC – 69 93-95 11
The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), formerly known as the Southern Negro Leaders Conference on Transportation and Nonviolent Integration is a civil rights organization founded in January 1957. This group was organized by Martin Luther King and it reflected Martin Luther King’s core beliefs. In 1964 it received a Nobel Peace prize.

George Wallace –George Corney Wallace He is best known for his pro-segregation attitudes, which he later recanted, during the American desegregation period. At his innauguration for govenor he can be quoted saying “Segregation Now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!”

MLK Jr. – Martin Luther King, Jr. (January 15, 1929 – April 4, 1968) was an American civil rights leader. The most famous leader of the American civil rights movement, and a Baptist minister. He was a peacemaker throughout the world he was always promoting nonviolence and equality of the races. He was assassinated in 1968.

ICBM –An intercontinental ballistic missile, or ICBM, is a very long-range missile that is typically designed for the delivery of nuclear weapons. They have great range and can be deployed from a variety of places.


Bay of Pigs - The Bay of Pigs is an U.S. invasion on Cuba that failed under Kennedy. It was a US backed invasion of Cuban exiles who wanted to overthrow Fidel Castro. The Kennedy Administration had hoped that the Cuban people would help with the cause. When help never came from the Cuban people the mission was declared a failure.
The Berlin Wall was an iconic symbol of the Cold War, It was constructed starting in 1961 and it was later torn down in 1989. The wall kept people from leaving or entering the divided Germany.
Nikita Kruschev – was the leader of the Soviet Union after the death of Stalin. He was removed from power by his party colleagues in 1964 and replaced Brezhnev. He spent the last seven years of his life under close supervision of the KGB.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was a confrontation during the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States regarding the Soviet deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba. The crisis began on October 16, 1962 when U.S. reconnaissance data revealed that Soviet nuclear missile installations on the island were showing up. Kruschev later agreed that the missile installations would be dismantled. This was the closest that we ever had gotten to a full nuclear war.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was US legislation that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The law was originally intended to protect black people but was later adopted to all peoples including women. The Act transformed the south overnight, and had a long-term impact on the nation as a whole. It prohibited discrimination in public places as well and done away with the Jim Crow laws that were in the south.


1965 Voting Rights Act – The National Voting Rights Act of 1965 made it to where there was no longer a Poll Tax and that the minorities and the poor could vote as well. The act also made it where there was help to register to vote. This opened it up to all men were now eligible to vote including blacks.
The Great Society was a set of domestic programs set into action by Lyndon B. Johnson and the two main goals of the Great Society were to eliminate poverty and to rid society of racial inequality. There were major programs to help with education, healthcare, and transportation. The Great Society resembled the New Deal domestic policies of FDR, but differed sharply in types of programs.
The Viet Cong – were created by the Hanoi regime and were part of the Peoples Liberation Armed Force merging the Vietminh of the South and the other anti-diem military group.

Warren Court – Earl Warren Chief Justice of the United States (from 1953 to 1969). As Chief Justice, his term of office was marked by numerous rulings affecting, among other things, the legal status of racial segregation, civil rights, separation of church and state, and police arrest procedure in the United States. Conservatives who favored judicial restraint denounced the activist Warren Court for making laws and not abiding by them.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which explicitly outlawed racial segregation of public education facilities, ruling on the grounds that the doctrine of "separate but equal" public education could never truly provide black Americans with facilities of the same standards available to white Americans.
The Tet Offensive (January 30, 1968 - June 8, 1969) was a series of operational offensives during the Vietnam War, coordinated between battalion strength elements of the viet cong and divisional strength elements of the North Vietnam's People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN), against South Vietnam's Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN), and United States military and other allied forces. The offensive began spectacularly during celebrations of the Lunar New Year, and sporadic operations associated with the offensive continued into 1969. The Tet Offensive can be considered a military defeat for the Communist forces, as neither the Viet Cong nor the North Vietnamese army achieved their tactical goals.
“Plumbers” – The so called plumbers were a group of former CIA and FBI agents that were hired by CREEP’s John Mitchell to break into the Watergate hotel.

“Smoking Gun” – The smoking gun during the Watergate scandal was the 29 minutes of the presidents tapes that were missing. The tape included information about the break in at the Watergate hotel and with the release of the tapes later ending in the president resignation.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a US agency responsible for protecting our health and with safeguarding the environment such as: air, water, and land. The EPA began in December of 1970 and it was established by President Richard Nixon.

Panama Canal Treaty – was a treaty in which guaranteed that the US would give control of the Panama Canal in 1999 if the US could build the canal and operate it until then.
The Camp David Accords were signed by the Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin on September 17, 1978, They are called the Camp David accords because for 12 days they had a secret meeting at Camp David negotiating them. This helped settle a peace between Israel and Egypt during Carter’s administration.
3 mile Island – On March 28, 1979, the nuclear power plant on Three Mile Island suffered a partial core meltdown. This was the worst accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power generating history. Approximately 25,000 people lived within 5 miles of the island at the time of the accident. Radioactive water leaked into the river. This accident strengthened the anti-nuclear campaign.
1954 Geneva Accord – was a conference between many countries that agreed to end hostilities and restore peace in French Indochina and Korea. It produced a set of treaties known as the Geneva Accords, signed on behalf of France and North Vietnam.

The Letter from Birmingham Jail – While King in jail he wrote a request for a non violent end to racism. It was smuggled out of jail and is now known as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail.”

CREEP – Committee to re-elect the president was Nixon’s fund raising organization and they are the ones that decided to break into the Watergate Hotel to get information on what the democrats had on the president.

“Saturday Night Massacre” – This is where Nixon ordered Richardson to fire Cox but he refused so Nixon dismissed the attorney general and ordered the attorney general’s deputy Ruckelhaus to fire Cox but he too refused so Nixon ordered Robert Bork to fire Cox and he did.


Fidel Castro – a bearded young cigar smoking insurgent, that had led a successful revolt against the corrupt Cuban Strong man Fulgencio Balista. He became an enemy of America after he overthrew the American supported Batista in 1959 and confiscated American owned land in Cuba.

Civil Rights in the 60’s

Kennedy was the first president of the 60’s and he was the president that had to handle all of the problems that were caused by the fighting for and against civil rights. The 1960’s were definitely a volatile time for uprisings against prejudices that were alive and well in our country at that time. This was a period in which old laws were challenged and new laws were fought for.
May of 1961, C.O.R.E. or the Congress for Racial Equality decided to fight to do away with the Jim Crow laws that were down in the south. Jim Crow laws prohibited Blacks from sitting anywhere but in the back of the bus, separated drinking fountains and rest rooms as well as where to eat or go to school. Ten workers both black and white decided to take a Greyhound bus to New Orleans from Washington and they did not concern themselves with the Jim Crow laws, they used the white bathrooms, drinking fountains and broke all the Jim Crow laws. These people were called the “Freedom Riders”.
Kennedy promised to put an end to segregation in 61’ but it was not until 1962 that he signed it into law. This was due to the violence that the “Freedom Riders” encountered during their journey in 1961. This was because the Freedom Riders were getting beat up and the police would not intervene to stop this horrendous action. Even the governor of Alabama, after he had agreed to protect the Freedom Riders at the presidents request, he reneged
At the First Baptist Church in Montgomery Alabama the Freedom Riders took refuge and there the now famous rev. Martin Luther King met them. The federal marshals had to protect them at the church.
In 1962 Martin Luther King formed the SCLC or Southern Christian Leadership Conference and hoped to desegregate the theaters and libraries as well as get the right to vote for African Americans. The SCLC was more effective in Birmingham, a town totally effected by the Jim Crow laws than a place that was not.
People in the 60’s would have sit-ins and lunch counter sit ins. The trend started at the Woolworths and went all across the country to help win the fight for desegregation. There were city hall protests and from the sit-ins and protests hundreds maybe even thousands were arrested. On April 10th King was even arrested because the city ordered a stop to the protests and King still led protests. While he was in jail he wrote a request for a non violent end to racism. It was smuggled out of jail and is now known as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail.”
From the time that King got out of jail he resumed his protests and marched 6000 African American Children to downtown. During their march downtown the police ordered them to be hosed down with high power fire hoses and then the police unleashed dogs to attack them.
These events made the national headline news and most Americans were dismayed. This even got the presidents attention and he said that the events “made him sick”.
Later that summer the civil rights movement continued and two students were admitted into the University of Alabama and they had to be protected by the national guard.
Martin Luther King and many black supporters marched on Washington, this was the “Jobs and Freedom” march and this is where his famous “I have a dream” speech was said. There were over a quarter of a million people who joined the march and was a highpoint of the civil rights movement of the 60’s.






















Watergate


Richard Nixon was the center of the Watergate scandal and it all began with the election of 1972. Well actually four months before the election when the Committee to Reelect the President authorized an illegal break in at the democratic headquarters in the Watergate hotel. The burglars were trying to find out if the democrats had anything against the republicans that they could use in a s smear campaign. The five men that broke into the Watergate hotel Democratic office were arrested and in possession of high tech equipment for spying on people. They tried to keep their identity separated from the government office that sent them to do the spying. Their story got broken by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward and published in the Washington Post. The story was leaked by Martha Mitchell the wife to one of the main men at CREEP.
John Mitchell the head of CREEP hired former CIA agents and FBI agents to break into the Watergate Hotel and retrieve any information that they could concerning what the Democrats knew about the Republicans. This was a failed attempt because they were caught and arrested.
The White House tried to distance themselves far from the break in and the burglary attempt was even referred to as a “third rate burglary attempt”. Nixon announced at a press conference that John Dean conducted an investigation and cleared all associated with the White House of such a heinous crime. He said that “no one on the White House staff, no one in this administration presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.” So this contained the problem during the presidency.
Watergate would consume the presidency and the country after the re election of Nixon. Even though Nixon did not directly have any thing to do with the break in at Watergate his downfall came when he denied that he knew nothing of it and that no one in the White House knew anything of it. Nixon had directed his aide Haldeman to tell the CIA to inform the FBI that they need to back off of the investigation. That if they perused the Watergate case that they may interfere or jeopardize confidential or sensitive intelligence operations.
The case got even more fouled up when the men that were arrested were fearing the worst and spilled all that they knew. Nixon now agreed that he would launch further investigations and fired Dean and Haldeman and Ehrlichman resigned.
The senate got involved and established a seven man team to further investigate Watergate. They had televised public hearings and found out further information that the break in started with Mitchell and CREEP. Dean told the committee that the president was offering clemency to the burglars who did not talk. They called for the Whitehouse taping system that records presidential conversations and found that the tapes were intack except for a couple of missing segments that President Nixon said that releasing those tapes would be an issue of National Security. The judge ordered Nixon to comply but Nixon wanted to compromise by submitting a written statement as to what was on the tape. The transcripts were later released the next year and the president came across as a mean spirited kind of guy.
The tapes were had still not been released and on July 27, 1974 there is a televised debate and the Judiciary Committee voted to impeach Nixon on the grounds of: impeding and investigation, attempting to protect those responsible, and trying to conceal the existence of covert activities. By this time Nixon had lost most all of his support. After the tapes were released, they proved to be the “smoking gun” that they were looking for. The tapes contained a conversation between Nixon and Haldeman concerning about how to stop the FBI investigation.
The day after the Judiciary Committee voted to impeach Nixon; Nixon resigned. Nixon’s Vice President took office in 1974 after Nixon’s resignation and now Gerald Ford was the president of the United States.

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Bobby Montgomery
September 18, 2006

Three Major Components of Truman’s Administration

There were three major components to Truman’s Administration; Civil Rights, Domestic Policies, and Foreign Policies. Civil Rights was a hot topic on the home front, with the Supreme Court ruling of the Brown vs. the Board of Education and desegregation of schools. Truman was not a strong domestic policy president, his main policy was the Fair Deal and it was not widely accepted. Foreign policy seemed to be Truman’s forte. His policy dealt with the Cold War and the Soviet threat.
Concerning Civil Rights Truman was very active and a committed supporter to see the equal treatment of blacks. Truman supported the Fair Employment Practices Commission and sought to get the act in place not just during war time but in peace time as well. Truman also proposed anti-lynching legislation. But, Truman did very little when he was opposed by congress. His greatest achievement of Civil Rights was the desegregation of the armed forces. This was an executive order that he implemented as the Commander and Chief.
On the Domestic front one of Truman’s domestic policies would be the Fair Deal. The Fair Deal was meant to revitalize the programs that Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented with the New Deal. He wanted to increase wages and implement a National Health Insurance. The Fair Deal was met with opposition, because, people did not want the New Deal back. This was caused by the people of the United States were in a good position financially and saw no need for this type of legislature.
Truman had several policies that I feel were very important during his years as president concerning foreign affairs. The three major components of Truman’s foreign policy, I believe were, the continuation of the Containment policy in which F.D. Roosevelt implemented, the Marshall Plan and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO. The Containment Policy was simply a continuation of FDR’s policy that said we need to keep our distance from the Communists. The Truman Doctrine dealt with economic aid to Greece and Turkey to help resist the Soviet influence. The Marshall Plan was a plan developed to send economic aid to Europe and then there was NATO or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATO is an alliance formed to militarily provide defense against Soviet aggression and other aggressors.
The first one of these three that we will look at is FDR’s Containment policy in which Truman backed. Winston Churchill said it best when he said “an Iron Curtain” is dividing Europe from the Communists. The Iron Curtain was a term that Churchill used to describe the way the country was divided.
The Truman Doctrine was formed because of Greece and Turkey were in need of aid and the British government could not give aid at the time because they had no money to give them. So to keep the soviets from dominating the Mediterranean Truman set before congress the plan to help Greece and Turkey resist the Soviet government. Four hundred million dollars was set aside to help the two countries. When Truman asked congress for the money he included in his speech that such aid would “support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities and that the fight was between “representative government, free elections, guarantees of individual liberty and freedom of speech and religion” and that the “terror and oppression, a controlled press and radio… and … suppression of personal freedoms” nevertheless this speech hooked congress and the money was appropriated.
The Marshall Plan was the next big thing in Truman’s foreign policy. The Marshall Plan was a plan that was developed by Secretary of State George C. Marshall to build up the European economy. Europe was described as “a rubble heap, a charnel house, a breeding ground for pestilence and hate” by Winston Churchill. America was afraid of the spread of communism or the “red amoeba” some referred to it as. Marshall thought that the United States could help build up the European nations and send aid to there rescue and help get rid of the Red Amoeba. Not all Americans liked the plan to send billions of tax payer dollars to aid a foreign country but congress committed itself to send 5.3 billion of aid to Europe in the efforts for European recovery. The Russians did not like this plan because they saw it as a anti-Russian or an anti-soviet plot. All in all the Americans provided twelve billion dollars toward the recovery of the European nations and it could be considered a success seeing that between 1947 and 1950 the national output of these nations helped throught the Marshall Plan was on average twenty five percent. The Marshall Plan was the beginning of European Cooperation that eventually led to the economic unification of Europe by the end of the twentieth century.
The last of Truman’s foreign affairs plan that we will talk about is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization otherwise known as NATO. NATO was the last step in drawing the lines of the cold war and it was spurred by a growing fear of the Soviet Union seeking to expand to the West. That is why the United States, Canada, Great Britain, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Norway, Denmark, Luxembourg, Iceland, and Portugal got together and formed NATO. NATO is formed that if one of these countries is attacked that the other countries in the Treaty would come to their aid. In essence, if you attack one then you attack all of them. The United States is a major backer of military might and money toward the NATO organization. It was the first treaty to be signed by the United States in times of peace and would be considered a bold move, a move that may overstep the authority of the president by committing troops without having to get congressional approval. By 1949 NATO was ratified by the senate and by 1952 the first NATO troops were deployed to Europe as a “tripwire” to guarantee that if the soviets invaded Europe that the Americans would join the fight.
Truman’s Civil Rights plan, was a good plan but, it was mostly about the vote. The votes of the African American were increasing in importance and he wanted all he could get of their votes. No matter what, the pretenses of the legislation was it was still a good policy and it did give more rights to the African Americans.
Looking again on Truman’s foreign policy goes, the three major plans that we looked at were the continuation of Containment, The Marshall Plan, and NATO. If you notice all of these plans have to deal with the Soviets. The Soviets were making the Americans uncomfortable and that is what spurred these foreign policies. On the home front Truman did not fare so well. It looks as if the Fair Deal may have been a complete flop. The book makes it sound as if the Fair Deal was rejected by the majority of the people because they were tired of social reform. The National Healthcare is one that I wish would have passed. Overall, Truman was a good president and even though his domestic agenda did not fair so well his foreign policies were outstanding.

Truman had several policies that I feel were very important during his years as president concerning foreign affairs. The three major components of Truman’s foreign policy I believe were Containment, the Marshall Plan and North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO. Containment first was seen in the Truman Doctrine that dealt with economic aid to Greece and Turkey to help them to resist the Soviet influence which later the Doctrine evolved into Containment. The Marshall Plan was a plan developed to send economic aid to Europe and then there was NATO or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATO is an alliance formed to militarily provide defense against Soviet aggression and other aggressors.
The first one of these three that we will look at is Truman’s Containment policy. Truman felt the same way as Winston Churchill felt. They both thought that we should separate us apart from the Soviet influence and that there should be, as Winston Churchill said, “an Iron Curtain” dividing us from the Soviets. Containment was first seen in the Truman Doctrine. The Truman Doctrine was formed because of Greece and Turkey were in need of aid and the British government could not give aid at the time because they had no money to give them. So to keep the soviets from dominating the Mediterranean Truman set before congress the plan to help Greece and Turkey resist the Soviet government. Four hundred million dollars was set aside to help the two countries. When Truman asked congress for the money he included in his speech that such aid would “support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities and that the fight was between “representative government, free elections, guarantees of individual liberty and freedom of speech and religion” and that the “terror and oppression, a controlled press and radio… and … suppression of personal freedoms” nevertheless this speech hooked congress and the money was appropriated.
The Marshall Plan was the next big thing in Truman’s foreign policy. The Marshall Plan was a plan that was developed by Secretary of State George C. Marshall to build up the European economy. Europe was described as “a rubble heap, a charnel house, a breeding ground for pestilence and hate” by Winston Churchill. America was afraid of the spread of communism or the “red amoeba” some referred to it as. Marshall thought that the United States could help build up the European nations and send aid to there rescue and help get rid of the Red Amoeba. Not all Americans liked the plan to send billions of tax payer dollars to aid a foreign country but congress committed itself to send 5.3 billion of aid to Europe in the efforts for European recovery. The Russians did not like this plan because they saw it as a anti-Russian or an anti-soviet plot. All in all the Americans provided twelve billion dollars toward the recovery of the European nations and it could be considered a success seeing that between 1947 and 1950 the national output of these nations helped throught the Marshall Plan was on average twenty five percent. The Marshall Plan was the beginning of European Cooperation that eventually led to the economic unification of Europe by the end of the twentieth century.
The last of Truman’s plans that we will talk about is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization otherwise known as NATO. NATO was the last step in drawing the lines of the cold war and it was spurred by a growing fear of the Soviet Union seeking to expand to the West. That is why the United States, Canada, Great Britain, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Norway, Denmark, Luxembourg, Iceland, and Portugal got together and formed NATO. NATO is formed that if one of these countries is attacked that the other countries in the Treaty would come to their aid. In essence, if you attack one then you attack all of them. The United States is a major backer of military might and money toward the NATO organization. It was the first treaty to be signed by the United States in times of peace and would be considered a bold move, a move that may overstep the authority of the president by committing troops without having to get congressional approval. By 1949 NATO was ratified by the senate and by 1952 the first NATO troops were deployed to Europe as a “tripwire” to guarantee that if the soviets invaded Europe that the Americans would join the fight.
Well the three major plans that we looked at under Truman’s foreign policies were Containment, The Marshall Plan, and NATO. If you notice all of these plans have to deal with the Soviets. The Soviets were making the Americans uncomfortable and that is what spurred these foreign policies.

The TEXAS pledge

"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one and indivisible."

"In 1933 the legislature passed a law establishing rules for the proper display of the flag and providing for a pledge to the flag: "Honor the Texas Flag of 1836; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one and indivisible." The pledge referred to the 1836 national flag, known as David G. Burnet's flag, instead of the Lone Star Flag. Senator Searcy Bracewell introduced a bill to correct this error in 1951, but the legislature did not delete the words "of 1836" until 1965."

During Truman’s presidency the three major topics or categories of policy came from the Civil Rights Movement, his domestic agenda and his foreign policy. In this brief synopsis of his policies we are going to look at what they were and summarize what I feel the general effectiveness of them were.
Concerning Civil Rights Truman was very active and a committed supporter to see the equal treatment of blacks. Truman supported the Fair Employment Practices Commission and sought to get the act in place not just during war time but in peace time as well. Truman also imposed some anti-lynching laws to make it illegal to kill the blacks without cause. But Truman did very little when he was opposed by congress. But he did end a segregated armed forces in the United States.
I believe that Truman had good intentions when it came to civil rights, but at the same time he was all about the vote and the African American vote was beginning to be important. Unfortunately Truman did not have much of a backbone when it came down to congress opposing his legislation.
On the Domestic front one of Truman’s domestic policies would be the Fair Deal. The Fair Deal was meant to revitalize the programs that Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented with the New Deal. He wanted to increase wages and implement a National Health Insurance. The Fair Deal was met with opposition because people did not want the New Deal back. People were upset with rising prices and continued shortages. They did not want social legislation.
Truman I believe had good intentions with the Fair Deal Act but the people were just tired of promises and they were tired of social reform. I myself feel that a national healthcare plan would be beneficial and would be a welcomed act at this time but after just coming out of the depression and fighting World War II the people opposed it.
As far as the National policies there were three big ones. Containment, the Marshall Plan and NATO. Containment was simply maintain your distance away from socialism. The Marshall Plan was a plan to aid Turkey and Greece and to keep the Mediterranean free of Soviet rule. When the British government told us that they could no longer send aid to Turkey and Greece the United States stepped up and aided those countries. North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO is very important because it formed an alliance between the Western nations that says if Russia attacks any of the alliance then all will fight.
On the National scope Truman did many great things. All of the policies that he implemented nationally concerned the Soviet Union. This was a very positive thing because during the Cold War the people of the United States needed a strong national leader and with Truman that is what we got.

Bobby Montgomery
History of Asia
September 18, 2006

History of Asia TIMELINE

1850 – 1865 - Taiping Rebellion
Nearly overthrew the reigning Manchu Dynasty that was led by Hong Xiuquan. He believed that he was the brother of Jesus and he was the first to mount a revolution to challenge the gentry

1867 June 10 – Opening of U.S. Consular Post Service in Shanhai

1870 Massacre of foreigners in Tietsin

1890’s - a small but highly significant number of the sons of the traditional landlord bureaucratic elite began to lose confidence in the utility. (this is where the seeds of the modern Chinese revolution were sown. Due to the sons of the gentry losing their belief in their moral right to succeed their fathers as rulers and emerged as an independent social stratum.

1895 - Sun Yet Sen launched the 1st of his abortive anti Manchu revolutionary
adventures.

1898 - Hundred Days reform- a famous coup that attempted to change China from the top but was aborted by a counter-coup that placed China back in the hands of the corrupt beurocracy’s

1899 Boxeer Rebellion spreads rapidly

1900 Boxers besiege eleven foreign legations in Peking.

1905 Sun Yatsen organizes the anti-Manchu dynasty overthrown

1911 - The Imperial Regime fell
Quasi revolution – the monarch fell and it deprived traditional values of their final claim to legitimacy, Political Opportunists cynically manipulated elements of Confucian tradition for reactionary purposes.

1912 – (1912-1916) dictatorship of Yuan Shikai

1913 – Yuan Shik-k’ai becomes president

1915 – (1915-1919) New Culture Movement which called for the total destruction of the traditions and the values of the past. The New Culture movement was started by Chen Duxiu Francophile and he founded the periodical XIN QINGNIAN or (New Youth) and eventually it was published in French as well. (La Jeunesse)

1916 – Yuan dies. Provicial governors declare their independence. Period of disunity and warlordism begins

1919 – May 4th 1919
[the true beginning of the modern Chinese revolution - More than 3000 university students in Beijing demonstrated against the decision of the Western democrats at the Versailles peace conference to transfer the former German imperialism concessions in Shandong province to Japan as war booty]

(((late 1919))) Chen Duxiu converted to Marxism so eventually the New Youth magazine became Marxist.

1920 – (1920’s) the emergence of a specifically Marxist oriented segment of the intelligentsia

- The foundations of the CCP were laid. Young Marxist activities established a variety of small communist groups in major cities of China.

1921 – Chen Duxiu Francophile became the first leader of the Chinese Communist party

- July 1921 – the National CCP formally came into existence when 12 delegates from different groups met at secret congresses. 1st in Shanghai then on a house boat near HangZou,

- 1921 – 1927 Counterrevolution

1923 – Russians ais Koumindang

1925 – Sun Yatsen dies of cancer

1926 – Peasant Communism spreads. ‘Chiang Kai Shek and his kuomindang government quarrel with communists

1927 - Hunan Report – Chaing massacres communists in Shanghai that sends soldiers against communists in the country. – Mao Ze Dond leads a peasant uprising in Hunan. Creation of the 4th red army

1928 – Mao Ze Dong and Chu The gain control of Kiangsi. They reform farming and educate the peasants

1931 – Chinese Soviet Republic -- Machuria occupied by Japan

1934 – Chang completes all out attack on the Red Army and it reaches the northern Shenshi with 20000 survivors

1935 – Politburo January of 1935

1936 – Zhou Enlai

1937 – Japanese Invasion Chang and communists agree to work together against the Japanese

1938 – Japanese occupy large area of China

1939 – WWII breaks out and the Japanese circulate worthless paper money and inflation spirals out of control

1943 –Early Communes formed in communist controlled areas of China

1945 – Civil war between communists and Chiangs Guomindong government – Russia occupies Manchuria

1948 – USA backs Guomindang and Nanking Falls to the communists

Many guomindang soldiers go over to support the communists. Communists take Peking and much of China.

1949 – 1949 – 1953 Hong Xiuquan

Bobby Montgomery
September 21, 2006

Eisenhower’s Key Policy Issues During His 2 Terms of Office

During Eisenhower’s two terms in office as the president of the United States, he implemented several policies. On his domestic agenda we will explore his policies toward Civil Rights, the Federal Aid Highway Act and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We will also look at his foreign policies as well.
According to the book Eisenhower was raised with a prejudice against blacks. So when it came to upholding the laws like the Supreme Court ruling in Brown verses the Board of Education it was not an easy task for him to do. In fact his thoughts clearly came out in this quote found in the book, “I don’t believe you can change the hearts of men with laws or decisions”. At any rate Eisenhower had to intervene with desegregation in Little Rock in 1957 by deploying the National Guard in order to uphold the law. Eisenhower was not a president that cared for civil rights but when it came down to upholding the law he did so to get the job done.
Probably his most notable work that he had done while in Office is his Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956. This act had been sought after for years but Eisenhower is the one that pushed saw that it became law. Because of this act there is now a system of Interstate Highways in the U.S. that speeds up transportation. It is beneficial for many reasons; it allows a person to travel from point A to point B without having to stop and it revolutionized the trucking industry.
Another important act that we saw due to Eisenhower’s administration is the National Aeronautics Space Act which was created to keep the U.S. in the space race. With the launch of the satellite, Sputnick, by the Russians, it created a since of urgency to do what no one has ever done in the past. That was to send a man to the moon. The creation of NASA has helped us achieve even more than going to the moon. We have become a more technologically advanced nation due to the creation of NASA.
Foreign policy under Eisenhower was carried out with the aid of his chief foreign policy advisor John Foster Dulles. To Dulles the issues of communism were like night and day. The sentiments of Dulles and those like him made the policy with Russia a potential “nuclear holocaust”, the threat of nuclear war was much greater under Eisenhower because tensions rose. But Eisenhower’s biggest foreign policy problem was that with Korea. He promised a cease fire in Korea but we did not see this cease fire until the death of Stalin in 1953.
Eisenhower introduces the “Open Skies” to Russia which proposed the limitation of Nuclear Arms and allowed for aerial surveillance. The policy was rejected by Russia and very little was accomplished at the Geneva Convention. The only thing that came out of the Geneva Convention was that we got to distribute some ‘feel good propaganda.’
During the Eisenhower administration we have seen many Acts and many policies that have helped to mold our nation into what it is today. Civil Rights have helped form equality of peoples in our nation today. The Interstate Highways have brought the nation together even more by making travel faster so we can go more places and the creation of NASA has made this great nation more technologically advanced. Concerning foreign affairs with Korea did not go as well and we were in the Korean War for far longer than the people wanted. Overall, I feel that Eisenhower was a great president and helped America as a whole.

Chapter 23 Ancient History Terms

Xanthippus was a Greek (possibly Spartan) mercenary general hired by the Carthaginians to aid in their war against the Romans during the First Punic War. He trained Carthaginian soldiers and led them into the battle of Tunis, where Carthaginian forces routed the Roman expeditionary force and captured the Roman consul Marcus Atilius Regulus in 255 BC.
Xanthippus is credited with the Carthaginian formation, cavalry split between the two wings, mercenary infantry on their right, with a hastily raised phalanx of civilians in the centre and a line of elephants in front of the infantry, which defeated the Romans formed in their normal formation, with the outnumbered cavalry on the wings and legionary infantry in the centre. He also realised the mistakes the Carthaginians were making by avoiding open ground (because of the Romans' superior infantry) which restricted the Carthaginian cavalry and elephants (the strongest parts of their armies).
MARCUS ATILIUS REGULUS, Roman general and consul (for the second time) in the ninth year of the First Punic War (256 B.C.). He was one of the commanders in the Punic naval expedition which shattered the Carthaginian fleet at Ecnomus, and landed an army on Carthaginian territory (see Punic Wars). The invaders were so successful that the other consul, L. Manlius Vulso, was recalled to Rome, Regulus being left behind to finish the war. After a severe defeat at Adys near Carthage, the Carthaginians were inclined for peace, but the terms proposed by Regulus were so harsh that they resolved to continue the war. In 255, Regulus was completely defeated and taken prisoner by the Spartan Xanthippus. There is no further trustworthy information about him. According to tradition, he remained in captivity until 250, when after the defeat of the Carthaginians at Panormus he was sent to Rome on parole to negotiate a peace or exchange of prisoners. On his arrival he strongly urged the senate to refuse both proposals, and returning to Carthage was tortured to death (Horace, Odes, iii. 5). This story made Regulus to the later Romans the type of heroic endurance; but most historians regard it as insufficiently attested, Polybius being silent. The tale was probably invented by the annalists to excuse the cruel treatment of the Carthaginian prisoners by the Romans
Hamilcar Barca or Barcas (~270228 BC) was a Carthaginian general and statesman, leader of the Barcid family, and father of Hannibal.
Milcar is perhaps the same as Mel karth, the Tyrian god. Baraq means "lightning" in Canaanite.
He distinguished himself during the First Punic War in 247 BC, when he took over the chief command in Sicily at a time when the island was almost completely in the hands of the Romans. Landing suddenly on the north-west of the island with a small mercenary force he seized a strong position on Mt. Erote (Monte Pellegrino, near Palermo), and not only maintained himself against all attacks, but carried his raids as far as the coast of south Italy.
In 244 BC he transferred his army to a similar position on the slopes of Mt. Eryx (Monte San Giuliano), from which he was able to lend support to the besieged garrison in the neighbouring town of Drepanum (Trapani). By a provision of the peace of 241 BC Hamilcar's unbeaten force was allowed to depart from Sicily without any token of submission.
Upon returning to Africa, his troops, which had been kept together only by his personal authority and by the promise of good pay, broke out into open mutiny when their rewards were withheld by Hamilcar's opponents among the governing aristocracy, starting the conflict later named Mercenary War. The serious danger into which Carthage was brought by the failure of the aristocratic generals was averted by Hamilcar, whom the government in this crisis could not but reinstate. By the power of his personal influence among the mercenaries and the surrounding African peoples, and by superior strategy, he speedily crushed the revolt (237 BC).
After this success Hamilcar enjoyed such influence among the popular and patriotic party that his opponents could not prevent him being raised to a virtual dictatorship. After recruiting and training a new army in some Numidian forays he led on his own responsibility an expedition into Hispania (236 BC), where he hoped to gain a new empire to compensate Carthage for the loss of Sicily and Sardinia, and to serve as a base for a campaign of vengeance against the Romans.
In eight years by force of arms and diplomacy he secured an extensive territory in Hispania, but his premature death in battle (228 BC) prevented him from completing the conquest. Hamilcar stood out far above the Carthaginians of his age in military and diplomatic skill and in strength of patriotism; in these qualities he was surpassed only by his son Hannibal, whom he had imbued with his own deep hatred of Rome and trained to be his successor in the conflict.
He is sometimes confused with Hamilcar, another Carthaginian general.
Hannibal Barca (247 BCc. 183 BC;[1][2][3][4][5] sometimes referred to as Hǎnnibal Barca) was a Carthaginian politician and statesman who is popularly credited as one of the finest military commanders in history. He lived in a period of tension in the Mediterranean, with both Carthage and Rome (then the Roman Republic) vying for control of the region. Considered by many as the greatest hero of Carthage, he is best known for his achievements in the Second Punic War, when he marched an army, which famously included war elephants, from Iberia over the Pyrenees and the Alps into northern Italy.
During his invasion of Italy he defeated the Romans in a series of battles, out of which the most famous included the Battles of Trebia, Trasimene and Cannae. After Cannae he seized the second largest city in Italy, Capua, but he lacked the strength necessary to attack the city of Rome itself. He maintained an army in Italy for more than a decade afterward, never losing a major engagement, but never able to push the war through to a conclusion. During that period of time, the Roman armies regrouped. A Roman counter-invasion of North Africa forced him to return to Carthage, where he was defeated in the Battle of Zama. The defeat forced the Carthaginian Senate to send him into exile. During this exile, he lived at the Seleucid court, where he acted as military advisor to Antiochus III in his war against Rome. Defeated in a naval battle, Hannibal fled again, this time to the Bithynian court. When the Romans demanded his surrender, he preferred to commit suicide rather than submit.
Hannibal is universally ranked as one of the greatest military commanders and tacticians in history. Military historian Theodore Ayrault Dodge once famously christened Hannibal the "father of strategy"[6] for the reason that even his greatest enemy, Rome, came to adopt elements of his military tactics in their strategic canon. This praise has earned him a strong reputation in the modern world and he was regarded as a "gifted strategist" by men like Napoleon Bonaparte and the Duke of Wellington. He has also been the basis for a number of films and documentaries.
Saguntum During the 5th century BC, the Celtiberian built a walled settlement on the hill overseeing the plain; a stretch of cyclopean limestone slabs from the former temple of Diana, survives, close to the modern church of Santa Maria, but the settlement site is still older. The city traded with Greek and Phoenician coastal colonies, and under their influence, minted its own coins. By (219 BC) Saguntum was a large and commercially prosperous town, which sided with the local Greek colonists and Rome against Carthage, and drew Hannibal's first assault, his siege of Saguntum, the opening move of the Second Punic War. After a harsh resistance of several months, related by the Roman historian Livy, Saguntum was captured in 218 by the armies of Hannibal.

Tiberius Sempronius Longus may refer to:
Tiberius Sempronius Longus (consul 218 BCE), who fought Hannibal's forces in the Second Punic War
His son, Tiberius Sempronius Longus (consul 194 BCE), who defended Roman settlements from the Gauls
Gaius Flaminius Nepos was a politician and consul of the Roman Republic in the 3rd century BC. He was the greatest popular leader to challenge the authority of the Senate before the Gracchi a century later.
In the aftermath of the First Punic War, Flaminius, a novus homo, was the leader of a reform movement which sought to reorganize state land in Italy. As tribune of the plebs in 232 BC, he passed a plebiscite which divided the land south of Ariminum, which had been conquered from the Gauls decades before, and gave it to poor families whose farms had fallen into ruin during the war. The Senate was opposed to this and he did not consult them, contrary to the constitution and tradition.
Flaminius was governor of Sicily in 227. Meanwhile, the reorganization of the land contributed to a renewed attack on Roman territory by the Gauls, whom the Romans finally defeated at the Battle of Telamon in 224. In 223 Flaminius was elected consul for the first time, and with Publius Furius Philus he forced the Gauls to submit to Rome, creating the province of Cisalpine Gaul.
In 221 Flaminius was magister equitum to Marcus Minucius Rufus, then in 220 chosen as censor along with Lucius Aemilius Papus. During his term he arranged for the Via Flaminia to be built from Rome to Ariminum, established colonies at Cremona and Placentia, reorganized the Centuriate Assembly to give the poorer classes more voting power, and built the Circus Flaminius on the Campus Martius. In 218, while serving in the Senate, he was the only senator to support the Lex Claudia, which prohibited senators from participating in overseas trade.
In 217, during the invasion of Italy by Hannibal, he was re-elected consul with Gnaeus Servilius, in what was considered a rebuke of the Senate's prosecution of the war. Flaminius raised new legions and marched north to meet Hannibal, but was ambushed at Lake Trasimene. The army was destroyed and Flaminius was killed. His supporters in the Senate began to lose power to the more aristocratic factions, and the Romans feared Hannibal would besiege their city. The Senate appointed as dictator Fabius Maximus.
Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus (c. 275 BC-203 BC), called Cunctator (the Delayer), was a Roman politician and soldier, born in Rome around 275 BC and died in Rome in 203 BC. He was consul five times (233 BC, 228 BC, 215 BC, 214 BC and 209 BC) and was twice dictator in 221 and again in 217 BC. He reached the office of censor in 230 BC. His epithet Cunctator (akin to the English noun cunctation) means "delayer" in Latin, and refers to his tactics in deploying the troops during the Second Punic War. His cognomen Verrucosus means warty, a reference to the wart above his upper lip.
Gaius Terentius Varro was a Roman consul and commander. Along with his colleague, Lucius Aemilius Paullus, he commanded at the Battle of Cannae during the Second Punic War, in 216 BC, against the Carthaginian general Hannibal. The battle proved to be a decisive Roman defeat.
Prior to being consul, he had been a praetor in 218 BC. He was elected proconsul in Picenum from 215213 BC, and in 208207 BC, as propraetor he held Etruria against Hannibal's younger brother Hasdrubal Barca. He went to Africa, in 200 BC as ambassador.
The Battle of Zama, generally accepted to have been fought on or around October 19 of 202 BC, was the final and decisive battle of the Second Punic War. A Roman army led by Scipio Africanus defeated a Carthaginian force led by Hannibal Barca. Soon after this defeat on their home ground, the Carthaginian senate sued for peace, ending the 17-year war.

Marcus Porcius Cato (Latin: M·PORCIVS·M·F·CATO[1]) (234 BC, Tusculum149 BC) was a Roman statesman, surnamed the Censor (Censorius), Sapiens, Priscus, or the Elder (Major), to distinguish him from Cato the Younger (his great-grandson).
He came of an ancient plebeian family, noted for some military services, but not ennobled by the discharge of the higher civil offices. He was bred, after the manner of his Latin forefathers, to agriculture, to which he devoted himself when not engaged in military service. But, having attracted the notice of Lucius Valerius Flaccus, he was brought to Rome, and became successively quaestor (204 BC), aedile (199 BC), praetor (198 BC), and finally consul (195 BC) together with his old patron.



Suffet In the various independent city states constituting Phoenicia proper (coasts of present Lebanon and Syria) and its "Punic" Mediterranean colonies such as a shofet (in Punic, suffet or suffete) was a non-royal magistrate granted control over a city-state, sometimes functioning much in the same way as a Roman dictator.
Following the overthrow of its monarchy in the 400s BC, Carthage, a former colony but the only Phoenician state that had kept full control over its own colonies and thus build up the only 'empire' (but republican and depending on mercenaries) able to threaten Rome's hegemony, was ruled by a number of aristocratic councils presided over colleagially by two suffetes, who served in similar capacity to Roman consuls.

Corsica (French: Corse; Corsican: Corsica) is the fourth largest island in the Mediterranean Sea (after Sicily, Sardinia, and Cyprus). It is located west of Italy, southeast of France, and north of the island of Sardinia.
Corsica is one of the 26 régions of France, although strictly speaking Corsica is called a "territorial collective" (collectivité territoriale) by law. As a territorial collective, it enjoys powers slightly more important than other French régions, but for the most part its status is quite similar to the status of the other régions. Corsica is referred to as a "région" in common speech, and is almost always listed among the other régions of France. Although the island is separated from the continental mainland by the Ligurian Sea, politically Corsica is considered part of Metropolitan France.
Corsica is famed as the birthplace of Napoléon Bonaparte.
Hiero II, tyrant of Syracuse from 270 to 215 BC, was the illegitimate son of a Syracusan noble, Hierocles, who claimed descent from Gelo. He was a former general of Pyrrhus of Epirus and an important figure of the First Punic War.
On the departure of Pyrrhus from Sicily (275 BC) the Syracusan army and citizens appointed him commander of the troops. He strengthened his position by marrying the daughter of Leptines, the leading citizen. In the meantime, the Mamertines, a body of Campanian mercenaries who had been employed by Agathocles, had seized the stronghold of Messana, and proceeded in harassing the Syracusans. They were finally defeated in a pitched battle near Mylae by Hiero, who was only prevented from capturing Messana by Carthaginian interference. His grateful countrymen then made him tyrant (270).
In 264 BC he again returned to the attack, and the Mamertines called in the aid of Rome. Hiero at once joined the Punic leader Hanno, who had recently landed in Sicily; but being defeated by the consul Appius Claudius Caudex, he withdrew to Syracuse. Pressed by the Roman forces, in 263 he was compelled to conclude a treaty with Rome, by which he was to rule over the south-east of Sicily and the eastern coast as far as Tauromenium (Polybius i. 8-16; Zonaras Viii. 9).
From this time till his death in 215 BC he remained loyal to the Romans, and frequently assisted them with men and provisions during the Punic wars (Livy xxi. 49-51, xxii. 37, xxiii. 21). He kept up a powerful fleet for defensive purposes, and employed his famous kinsman Archimedes in the construction of those engines that, at a later date, played so important a part during the siege of Syracuse by the Romans
Appius Claudius Caudex was a patrician member of the Claudii. He was the grandson of Appius Claudius Caecus through his father Gaius, and served as consul in 264 BC.
In that year, he drew Rome into conflict with Carthage over possession of Sicily. In 265 BC, Hiero II of Syracuse had attacked Messina in an attempt to recapture it from the Mamertines, mercenaries from Campania who had taken it from him some years before. The Mamertines allied with a nearby Carthaginian fleet and held off the Syracusans, but when the Carthaginians did not leave, the Mamertines appealed to Rome in 264 BC.
Some senators were opposed to helping them, but Appius Claudius persuaded the citizens to support them. He led a force to Messina, and as the Mamertines had convinced the Carthaginians to withdraw he met with only a symbolic resistance. The Mamertines handed the city over to Appius Claudius, but the Carthaginians returned to set up a blockade. The Syracusans, meanwhile, were also stationed outside the city. Claudius tried to send ambassadors to both the Carthaginians and the Syracusans, but he was ignored. He then led his troops outside the city defeated the Syracusans in battle, and Hiero retreated back to Syracuse. The next day Claudius also defeated the Carthaginians.
This dispute was one of the immediate causes of the First Punic War.
His son was Publius Claudius Pulcher, consul in 249 BC.
A corvus (meaning "raven" in Latin) was a Roman military boarding device used in naval warfare during the First Punic War against Carthage.
In the Book III of his History, Polybius describes the corvus like a bridge 1.2 m (4 ft) wide and 10.9 m (36 ft) long, with a small parapet on both sides. The engine was probably used in the prow of the ship, where a system of pulleys and a pole allowed the bridge to be raised and lowered. There was a heavy spike shaped as a bird's beak on the underside of the device, hence the name "raven". The spike was designed to pierce the enemy ship's deck when the corvus was lowered. This allowed a firm grip between the vessels and a boarding route for the legionaries.
In the 3rd century BC, Rome was not a naval power and had little or no experience in war at sea. In fact, before the first Punic war, the Roman Republic had not campaigned outside the Italian Peninsula. The Republic's military strength was on land, and her greatest assets were the discipline and courage of her soldiers. The corvus allowed her to use her army against the superior Carthaginian navy. The Romans' application of boarding tactics worked; they won several battles, most notably those of Mylae, Sulci, Tyndaris, and Ecnomus. Despite its advantages, the corvus had serious drawbacks: modern enactments show that its weight on the prow compromised the ship's navigability. Romans lost almost two entire fleets to storms in 255 and in 249 BC, largely due to the instability caused by the device. These losses were probably the main reason for the abandonment of the corvus in ship design by the end of the war. As Roman Naval tactics improved and her crews became more experienced, the advantage of the corvus in battle no longer outweighed the risk involved in using it. It is not mentioned in period sources after the battle of Ecnomus and apparently the battle of the Aegates Islands that decided the first Punic war was won without them; however an evolution of the corvus, called arpax, was used in the battle of Naulochus.
Numidia was an ancient Berber kingdom in North Africa that later became a Roman province, and is no longer in existence today. It was located on the eastern coast of modern day Algeria, bordered by the Roman province of Mauretania (west coast of modern Algeria) to the west, the Roman province of Africa (modern day Tunisia) to the east, the Mediterranean Sea to the north, and the Sahara Desert to the south.
Hasdrubal the Fair (d. 221 BC) was a Carthaginian leader.
He was a son-in-law of Hamilcar Barca, who followed the latter in his campaign against the governing aristocracy at Carthage at the close of the First Punic War, and in his subsequent career of conquest in Hispania. After Hamilcar's death (228 BC) Hasdrubal, who succeeded him in the command, extended the newly acquired empire by skilful diplomacy, and consolidated it by the foundation of Carthago Nova (Cartagena) as the capital of the new province, and by a treaty with the Roman Republic which fixed the Ebro as the boundary between the two powers. He was killed by a Celtic assassin.
Hasdrubal Barca (d. 207 BC) was a Carthaginian general in the Second Punic War. He was the second son of Hamilcar Barca, and younger brother of Hannibal.


Hasdrubal Barca
Hasdrubal was present when the Spanish ambushed the Carthaginian forces at Acre Luce. He along with his brother Hannibal escaped, Hamilcar led the Spanish in the opposite direction and drowned in the River Jucar.
Hannibal, when he set out for Italy, left a force of 13,000 infantry, 2,550 cavalry and 21 elephants in Spain. The Punic navy had a fleet of 50 Quinqueremes and 5 Triremes stationed there. However, only 32 Quinqueremes were manned at the start of the Second Punic War
Left in command of Hispania when Hannibal departed to Italy in 218 BC, Hasdrubal was destined to fight for six years against the brothers Gnaeus and Publius Cornelius Scipio. The expedition Gnaeus Scipio in 218 BC had caught the Carthaginians by surprise, and before Hasrdrubal could join Hanno, the Carthaginian commander on the North of Ebro River, the Romans had fought and won the Battle of Cissa and established their army at Tarraco and their fleet at Emporiae. Hasdrubal raided the Romans with a flying column, which inflicted severe losses and on their naval crews and reduced the fighting strength to 35 ships. This loss was offset by the arrival of an allied Greek contingent from the city of Massilia.
In the spring of 217 BC, Hasdrubal led a joint expedition north to fight the Romans. Gnaeus Scipio surprised the Carthaginian fleet under Himilco and crushed it at the Battle of Ebro River. Hasdrubal retreated without fighting. The year 216 was spent quelling an uprising of Spanish tribes, possibility the Trudenani around the area near Gades.
Hasdrubal was reinforced by 4,000 infantry and 500 cavalry and was ordered by the Carthaginian senate to march to Italy in the same year. He left Himilco in charge at Cartagena and marched for the Ebro river, but was heavily defeated in the Battle of Dertosa in the spring of 215 BC. This defeat prevented reinforcements reaching Hannibal from both Spain and Africa at a critical moment of the War, when the Carthaginians held the upper hand in Italy. The Carthaginians were forced to contest the Romans in the area between the Ebro and Jucor rivers.
This defeat also led to Hanno the Great, Mago Barca and Hasdrubal Gisco arriving in Spain with three armies and ending the undisputed command of the Barcid family in Spain. The Carthaginains fought the Scipio brothers and had on the whole the worst of the conflict between 215 and 212 BC. At the instigation of the Romans, Syphax, one of the kings of the Numidian tribes, attacked Carthaginian territories in 213/212 BC. The situation in Spain was suffuciantly under control, because Hasdrubal crossed over to Africa and crushed the threat of Syphax. The aid of Masinissa, a Numidian prince, was invaluable during this episode, and he crossed over to Spain with Hasdrubal after the African expedition ended with 3,000 Numidian cavalry.
In late 212 BC Hasdrubal acted with imagination and initive, and with timely cooperation from Mago and Hasdrubal Gisco, completely routed his opponents at the Battle of the Upper Baetis, destroying the majority of the Roman army in Spain and killing both the Scipios. Carthaginians gained control of Spain up to the Ebro as a result of this vicory. Lack of cooperation between the Carthginian generals after the battle led the surviving Roman force of 8,000 surviving north of the river Ebro. The Romans reinforced this detachment with 10,000 troops under Cladius Nero in 211 BC and with another 10,000 soldiers under Scipio Africanus Major in 210 BC, who spent the year training his army and improving his diplomatic contacts.
Hasdrubal was subsequently outgeneralled by Scipio Africanus Major, who in 209 BC captured Carthago Nova and gained other advantages. Hasdrubal was defeated by Scipio at the Battle of Baecula, but managed to retreat with 2/3 of his army intact.
In the same year he was summoned to join his brother in Italy. He eluded Scipio by crossing the Pyrenees at their western extremity, and, making his way thence through Gaul and the Alps in safety, penetrated far into Central Italy in 207 BC. He was ultimately checked by two Roman armies, and being forced to give battle was decisively defeated at the Battle of the Metaurus. Hasdrubal himself fell in the fight; his head was cut off and thrown into Hannibal's camp as a sign of his utter defeat, in stark contrast of Hannibal's treatment of the bodies of fallen Roman Consuls.
It is hard to judge the true ability of Hasdrubal Barca as a general, as we know more about his defeats than his successes.
The Ebro (Catalan: Ebre) is Spain's most voluminous and second longest river. It starts at Fontibre (in the province of Cantabria) and passes Miranda de Ebro, Logroño, Zaragoza, Flix, Tortosa, and Amposta before ending in a delta on the Mediterranean Sea in the province of Tarragona.
Publius Cornelius Scipio (died 211 BC) was a general and statesman of the Roman Republic.
A member of the Cornelia gens, Scipio served as consul in 218 BC, the first year of the Second Punic War, and sailed with an army from Pisa to Massilia (today Marseille), with the view of arresting Hannibal's advance on Italy. Failing, however, to meet his enemy, he hastened to return by sea to Cisalpine Gaul, having sent his army on to Hispania under the command of his older brother Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus, with instructions to hold the Carthaginian forces there in check.
On his return to Italy he at once advanced to meet Hannibal. In a sharp cavalry engagement near the Ticinus, a tributary of the Po river, he was defeated and severely wounded. In December of the same year, he again witnessed the complete defeat of the Roman army at the Trebia, when his fellow consul Tiberius Sempronius Longus insisted on fighting contrary to his advice.
Despite the military defeats, he still retained the confidence of the Roman people: his term of command was extended and the following year found him in Hispania with his brother Calvus, winning victories over the Carthaginians and strengthening Rome's position in the Iberian peninsula. He continued the Iberian campaigns until 211 when he was killed in the defeat of his army on the upper Baetis river, the same year Calvus and his army was destroyed at Ilorci near Carthago Nova. The details of these campaigns are not accurately known, but it seems that the ultimate defeat and death of the two Scipiones was due to the desertion of the Celtiberians, bribed by Hasdrubal Barca, Hannibal's brother.
He was the son of Lucius Cornelius Scipio, and he was the father of Scipio Africanus Major, whose original name was likewise Publius Cornelius Scipio.
The Battle of the Trebia (or Trebbia) was the first major battle of the Second Punic War, fought between the Carthaginian forces of Hannibal and the Roman Republic in 218 BC.

The Battle of Lake Trasimene (June 24, 217 BC, April on the Julian calendar) was a Roman defeat in the Second Punic War between the Carthaginians under Hannibal and the Romans under the consul Gaius Flaminius. The battle is perhaps one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history.

Lucius Aemilius Paullus (d. 216 BC) was a Roman general. He was consul twice, in 219 and 216 BC.
He served his first consulship with Marcus Livius Salinator. During this year, he defeated Demetrius of Pharos, in the Second Illyrian War and forced him to flee to the court of Philip V of Macedon. Upon his return to Rome, he was awarded a triumph. He was subsequently charged, along with his colleague, with unfairly dividing the spoils, although he was acquitted.
During the Second Punic War, he was made consul a second time and served with Gaius Terentius Varro. He shared the command of the army with Varro at Battle of Cannae. Varro lead out the troops against the advice of Paullus and the battle became a crushing defeat for the Romans. Paullus died in the battle while Varro got away.
He was the father of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus and his daughter, Aemilia Tertia, married Scipio Africanus. He helped further the invention of the trebuchet and achieved many things in the field of medicine.
Cannae (mod. Canne della Battaglia), an ancient village of the Apulia region of south east Italy. It is situated near the river Aufidus (mod. Ofanto), on a hill on the right bank, 9.6 km (6 miles) southwest from its mouth, and 9 km southwest from Barletta.
It is primarily known for the Battle of Cannae, in which the Romans were defeated by Hannibal in 216 BC (see Punic Wars). There is a considerable controversy as to whether the battle took place on the right or the left bank of the river.
In later times the place became a municipium, and unimportant Roman remains still exist upon the hill known as Monte di Canne. In the Middle Ages it became a bishopric, but was destroyed in 1276.
Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus Major (Latin: P·CORNELIVS·P·F·L·N·SCIPIO·AFRICANVS¹) (235183 BC) was a general in the Second Punic War and statesman of the Roman Republic. He was best known for defeating Hannibal of Carthage, a feat that earned him the surname Africanus, the nickname 'the Roman Hannibal' and recognition as one of the finest commanders in military history.
Scipio (L., rod or staff) was born in 236 BC in Rome into the Scipio branch of the Cornelii family. Several ancestors had been consuls successively, and his great-grandfather, Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus, had been patrician censor in 280 BC. The Cornelii were counted among the five major patrician families —the others being the Fabii, the Aemilii, the Claudii, and the Valerii — and at the time Scipio Africanus lived, the Scipiones were probably its most prominent branch.
Scipio was the elder son of Publius Cornelius Scipio, praetor and consul, by his wife Pomponia, who was apparently of a prominently knightly and plebian family. Scipio was known to have visited the temple daily as he took dreams about gods and omens seriously. He is also thought to have consulted with, or at least informed his mother before deciding to run for curule aedile, the most junior magistrate who was entitled to enter the Senate. Scipio ran for this office at the age of 24. His younger brother was Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus. Little else is known about his childhood.
[edit]
Early Military Service
At an early age, Scipio joined the Roman struggle against Carthage in the Second Punic War. At some point he is said to have promised his father to continue the struggle against Carthage all his life, showing similar dedication to that of his enemy, Hannibal.
The young Scipio survived the disastrous battles at Ticinus, Trebia and Cannae. According to one tradition, he saved his father's life when he was 18, at the Battle of Ticinus. Scipio's would-be father-in-law Lucius Aemilius Paullus was killed in 216 BC at the third of these battles, the Battle of Cannae. Despite these defeats at the hands of the Carthaginians, Scipio remained focused on securing Roman victory.
On hearing that Lucius Caecilius Metellus and other politicians were at the point of surrender, Scipio gathered what his follower and stormed into the meeting, where at sword-point he forced all present to swear that they would continue in faithful service to Rome. Fortunately, the Roman Senate was of like mind and refused to entertain thoughts of peace despite the great losses Rome had taken in the war (approximately one-fifth of the men of military age had died within a few years).
Scipio offered himself as a candidate for the curule aedileship in the year 212 BC, apparently to assist his less popular cousin, Lucius Cornelius, who was also standing for election. The Tribunes of the Plebs (elected representatives from the Plebian Assembly) objected to his candidacy, saying that he could not be allowed to stand because he had not yet reached the legal age - curule aediles were automatically entitled to enter the Senate and the legal age for Senate membership was 30. Scipio's reply was, "If the quirites (the Roman citizens) are unanimous in their desire to appoint me Aedile, I am quite old enough..."[citation needed] Scipio, already known for his bravery and patriotism, was elected unanimously and the Tribunes abandoned their opposition.
[edit]
Campaign in Hispania


Nicholas Poussin's painting of the Continence of Scipio, depicting his return of a captured young woman to her fiancé, having refused to accept her from his troops as a prize of war.
In 211 BC both Scipio's father, Publius Scipio, and uncle, Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus, were killed in battle against Hannibal's brother, Hasdrubal Barca. In the following year Scipio offered himself for the command of the new army which the Romans resolved to send to Hispania. In spite of his youth, his noble demeanor and enthusiastic language had made so great an impression that he was unanimously elected to be sent there as proconsul. In the year of Scipio's arrival (210 BC) all of Hispania south of the Ebro river was under Carthaginian control. Hannibal's brothers Hasdrubal and Mago, and Hasdrubal Gisco were the generals of the Carthaginian forces in Hispania, and Rome was aided by the inability of these three figures to act in concert. The Carthaginians were also preoccupied with revolts in Africa.
Scipio landed at the mouth of the Ebro and was able to surprise and capture Carthago Nova, the headquarters of the Carthaginian power in Hispania. He obtained a rich cache of war stores and supplies, and an excellent harbor and base of operations. Scipio's humanitarian conduct toward prisoners and hostages in Hispania helped in portraying the Romans as liberators as opposed to conquerors. Livy tells the story of the capture of a beautiful woman by his troops, who offered her to Scipio as a prize of war. Scipio, astonished by her beauty, thanked his troops but discovered that the woman was betrothed to a local chieftain. He returned her to her fiancé, along with the money that had been offered by her parents to ransom her. While Scipio was long known for his great chivalry, Scipio doubtless also realized that the Senate's first priority was the war in Italy, and in the midst of the Carthaginian base in Hispania, he was to be outnumbered without much hope of reinforcement. It was paramount therefore that Scipio cooperate with local chieftains to both supply and reinforce his small army. The woman's fiance (who soon married her) naturally brought over his tribe to support the Roman armies.[citation needed]
In 209 BC Scipio fought his first set piece battle, driving back Hasdrubal Barca from his position at Baecula on the upper Guadalquivir. Scipio feared that the armies of Mago and Gisco would enter the field and surround his small army. Scipio's objective was, therefore, to quickly eliminate one of the armies to give him the luxury of dealing with the other two piecemeal. The battle was decided by a determined Roman infantry charge up the center of the Carthaginian position. Roman losses are uncertain but may have been considerable in light of an effort by the infantry to scale an elevation defended by Carthaginian light infantry. Scipio then orchestrated a frontal attack by the rest of his infantry to draw out the remainder of the Carthaginian forces.
Hasdrubal had not noticed Scipio's hidden reserves of cavalry moving behind enemy lines, and a Roman cavalry charge created a double envelopment on either flank led by cavalry commander Gaius Laelius and Scipio himself. This broke the back of Hasdrubal's army and routed his forces -- an impressive feat for the young Roman versus the veteran Carthaginian general. Despite a Roman victory, Scipio was unable to hinder the Carthaginian march to Italy. Much historical criticism has been leveled at his inability to effectively pursue Hasdrubal, who would eventually cross the Alps only to be defeated by Gaius Claudius Nero at the Battle of the Metaurus.
One popular theory for Scipio's failure to pursue Hasdrubal is that Scipio merely wanted the glory of securing Spain, and an extended mountain campaign would have endangered that. Others cite the Roman soldiers' appetite for plunder as preventing him from rallying in pursuit. The most probable explanation from a strategic standpoint is Scipio's unwillingness to risk being trapped between Hasdrubal's army on one side and one or both of Gisgo's and Mago's armies, both of superior numerical strength. Mere days after Hasdrubal's defeat, Mago and Gisgo were able to converge in front of the Roman positions, bringing into question what would have happened had Scipio pursued Hasdrubal.
After winning over a number of Hispanian chiefs Scipio achieved a decisive victory in 206 BC over the full Carthaginian levy at Ilipa (now the city of Alcalá del Río, near Hispalis, now called Seville), which resulted in the evacuation of Hispania by the Punic commanders.
After his rapid success in conquering Spain, and with the idea of striking a blow at Carthage in Africa, Scipio paid a short visit to the Numidian princes Syphax and Massinissa. Numidia was of vital importance to Carthage, supplying both mercenaries and allied forces. In addition to supplying the Numidian cavalry (on which see the Battle of Cannae), Numidia operated as a buffer for vulnerable Carthage. Scipio managed to receive support from both Syphax and Massinissa. Syphax later changed his mind, marrying the beautiful Carthaginian noblewoman Sophonisba, daughter of Hasdrubal the son of Gisco, and fighting alongside his Carthaginian in-laws against Massinissa and Scipio in Africa.
On his return to Hispania, Scipio had to quell a mutiny which had broken out among his troops. Hannibal's brother Hasdrubal had meanwhile marched for Italy, and in 206 BC Scipio himself, having secured the Roman occupation of Hispania by the capture of Gades, gave up his command and returned to Rome.
[edit]
African Campaign
In the following year, 205 BC, Scipio was unanimously elected to the consulship at the age of 31. Scipio wanted to go to Africa, but his jealous enemies in the Roman senate only allowed him to go as far as Sicily and did not grant him an army. Nevertheless, Scipio raised and trained a volunteer army while in Sicily.
By this time Hannibal's movements were restricted to the southwestern toe of Italy. Scipio was intent on transferring the war to Africa, and his great name drew to him a number of volunteers from all parts of Italy. Interestingly, among these volunteers were the shamed survivors of the fiasco at the Battle of Cannae, anxious to once again prove their worth as soldiers. Scipio began creating Sicily as a training camp and a staging point for his conceived invasion.
Scipio realized that the Carthaginian, and especially Numidian superiority in cavalry would prove decisive against the largely infantry forces of the Roman legions. In addition, a large portion of Rome's cavalry were allies of questionable loyalty, or noble equites exempting themselves from being lowly foot soldiers. One anecdote tells of how Scipio pressed into service several hundred Sicilian nobles to create a cavalry force. The Sicilians were quite opposed to this servitude to a foreign occupier (Sicily being under Roman control only since the First Punic War), and protested vigorously. Scipio assented to their exemption from service providing they pay for a horse, equipment, and a replacement rider for the Roman Army. In this way, Scipio created a trained nucleus of cavalry for his African campaign.
The Roman Senate sent a commission of inquiry to Sicily and found that Scipio was at the head of a well-equipped and trained fleet and army. Scipio pressed the Senate for permission to cross into Africa. The conservative branch of the Roman Senate, championed by Fabius Maximus, the Cunctator (Delayer), opposed the mission. Fabius still feared Hannibal's power, and viewed any mission to Africa as dangerous and wasteful to the war effort. Scipio was also harmed by some senators' disdain of his Hellenophile tastes in art, luxuries, and philosophies. The introduction (205 BC) of the Phrygian worship of Cybele and the transference of the image of the goddess herself from Pessinus to Rome to bless the expedition may have affected public opinion against Scipio as well. All Scipio could obtain was permission to cross over from Sicily to Africa if it appeared to be in the interests of Rome, but not financial or military support.
At the commissioners' bidding Scipio sailed in 204 BC and landed near Utica. Carthage, meanwhile, had secured the friendship of the Numidian Syphax, whose advance compelled Scipio to abandon the siege of Utica and dig in on the shore between there and Carthage. The following year he destroyed the combined armies of the Carthaginians and Numidians by approaching by stealth and setting fire to the Carthaginian-Numidian camp, where the combined army became panic stricken and fled only to be destroyed by Scipio's army. Though not a "battle," both Polybius and Livy estimate that the death toll in this single attack exceeded 40,000 Carthaginian and Numidian dead, and more captured.
Historians are roughly equal in their praise and condemnation for this act. Polybius said, "of all the brilliant exploits performed by Scipio this seems to me the most brilliant and more adventurous." On the other hand, one of Hannibal's principal biographers, Theodore Ayrault Dodge, goes so far to suggest that this attack was out of cowardice and spares no more than a page upon the event in total, despite the fact that it secured the siege of Utica and effectively put Syphax out of the war. The irony of Dodge's accusations of Scipio's cowardice is the attack showed traces of Hannibal's penchant for ambush.
Scipio quickly dispatched his two lieutenants, Laelius and Masinissa, to pursue Syphax. These lieutenants ultimately dethroned Syphax, ensuring Prince Masinissa's corronation as King of the Numidians. Carthage, and especially Hannibal himself, had long relied upon these superb natural horsemen who would now fight for Rome and against Carthage.
[edit]
War with Hannibal, the Battle of Zama
With Carthage now deserted by her allies, and surrounded by a veteran and undefeated Roman army which Dodge states was the best ever fielded, Carthage began opening diplomatic channels for negotiation. At this Hannibal Barca returned to Carthage, and despite the moderate terms offered to Carthage by Scipio, Carthage suddenly suspended negotiations and again prepared for war. The army that Hannibal returned with is a subject of much debate. Apologists for Hannibal often claim that his army was mostly Italians pressed into service from Southern Italy, and that most of his elite veterans (and certainly cavalry) were spent. Scipio's advocates tend to be far more suspicious, and believe the number of veteran forces to remain significant.
Hannibal did have a trained pool of soldiers who had fought personally in Italy, as well as eighty massive war elephants. Hannibal could boast a strength of 58,000 infantry and 6,000 cavalry, compared to Scipio's 34,000 infantry and 8,700 cavalry. The two generals met on a plain between Carthage and Utica on October 19, 202 BC at the Zama. Despite mutual admiration, negotiations floundered, due largely to Roman distrust of the Carthaginians as a result of to the Carthaginian attack on Saguntum, the breach of protocols which ended the First Punic War (known as Punic Faith), and a perceived breach in contemporary military etiquette due to Hannibal's numerous ambushes.
The Battle of Zama itself is recounted elsewhere, but it is noteworthy to cite Scipio's contribution to its outcome. Hannibal had arranged his infantry in three phalangial lines designed to overlap the Roman lines. His strategy, so oft reliant upon subtle strategems, was simple: a massive forward attack by the war elephants would create vulnerable gaps in the Roman lines, and these would be attacked from lines of infantry, and supported by cavalry.
Rather than arranging his forces in the traditional manipular lines, which put the velites, principes, and triarii in succeeding lines of 500 men groups, Scipio instead put the maniples in a chequer pattern, with his elite heavy infantry in diagonals. This was done to match the length of the Carthaginian line, but also as a strategem against the war elephants. When the Carthaginian elephants charged, they found well laid traps before the Roman position, and were greeted by Roman trumpeters which drove many back out of confusion and fear. Roman javelins were used to good effect, and the sharp traps caused further disorder among the elephant calvary. Many of the elephants were so distraught that they charged back into their own Carthaginian lines. The Roman infantry was greatly rattled by the elephants, but Massinissa's Numidian and Laelius' Roman cavalry began to charge the opposing cavalry off the field. Both calvary commanders pursued their routing Carthaginian counterparts, leaving the Carthaginian and Roman infantries to engage one another. The resulting infantry clash was fierce and bloody, with neither side achieving local superiority. The Roman infantry had driven off the 2 front lines of the Carthaginian army and in the respite took an opportunity to water. The Roman army was then drawn up in a long line a single soldier deep and then marched towards Hannibals veterans who had not yet taken part in the battle. The final struggle was bitter, and only won when the allied cavalry rallied and returned to the battle field. Charging the rear of Hannibal's army, they caused what many historians have called the "Roman Cannae."
Because of the exertions of Rome and her allies against Carthage many Roman aristocrats, especially Cato, expected Scipio to raze that city to the ground after his successful campaign. However, Scipio dictated extremely moderate terms in contrast to an immoderate Roman Senate. At Scipio's consent Hannibal was allowed to become the civic leader of Carthage as a byproduct of Scipio's moderation (which the Cato family did not forget). Despite his moderation towards the Carthaginians, he was cruel towards the Roman and the Latin deserters: the Latins were beheaded and the Romans crucified.
[edit]
Return to Rome
Scipio was welcomed back to Rome in triumph with the agnomen of Africanus. He refused the many further honours which the people would have thrust upon him such as Consul and Dictator for life. In the year 199 BC, Scipio was elected Censor and for some years afterwards he lived quietly and took no part in politics.
In 193 BC Scipio was one of the commissioners sent to Africa to settle a dispute between Massinissa and the Carthaginians, which the commission did not achieve. This may have been because Hannibal, in the service of Antiochus III of Syria, might have come to Carthage to gather support for a new attack on Italy. In 190 BC, when the Romans declared war against Antiochus III, Publius offered to join his brother Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus, if the Senate entrusted the chief command to him. The two brothers brought the war to a conclusion by a decisive victory at Magnesia in the same year.
Antiochus I Soter (i.e. "Saviour") (324/​323-​262/​261 BCE), was an emperor of the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire. He reigned from 281 - 261 BCE. He was half Persian, his mother Apame being one of those eastern princesses whom Alexander the Great had given as wives to his generals in 324 BCE.
On the assassination of his father Seleucus I in 281 BCE, the task of holding together the empire was a formidable one, and a revolt in Syria broke out almost immediately. With his father's murderer, Ptolemy Keraunos, Antiochus was soon compelled to make peace, abandoning apparently Macedonia and Thrace. In Asia Minor he was unable to reduce Bithynia or the Persian dynasties that ruled in Cappadocia.
In 278 BCE the Gauls broke into Asia Minor, and a victory that Antiochus won over these hordes is said to have been the origin of his title of Soter (Gr. for "saviour").
At the end of 275 BCE the question of Coele-Syria, which had been open between the houses of Seleucus and Ptolemy since the partition of 301 BCE, led to hostilities (the "First Syrian War"). It had been continuously in Ptolemaic occupation, but the house of Seleucus maintained its claim.
War did not materially change the outlines of the two kingdoms, though frontier cities like Damascus and the coast districts of Asia Minor might change hands.
About 262 BCE Antiochus tried to break the growing power of Pergamum by force of arms, but suffered defeat near Sardis and died soon afterwards. His eldest son Seleucus, who had ruled in the east as viceroy from 275 BCE(?) till 268/267 BCE, was put to death in that year by his father on the charge of rebellion. He was succeeded (261 BCE) by his second son Antiochus II Theos.
After the death of his father, Antiochus married his step-mother, Stratonice, daughter of Demetrius Poliorcetes, their son Antiochus II Theos succeeded his father.
Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus Africanus Numantinus (185 - 129 BC) was a leading general and politician of the ancient Roman Republic. As consul he commanded at the final siege and destruction of Carthage in 146 BC, and was a leader of the senators opposed to the Gracchi in 133 BC.
He was born the younger son of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus, the conqueror of Macedonia, and fought when he was 17 years old by his father's side at the Battle of Pydna, which decided the fate of Macedonia and made northern Greece subject to Rome. He was adopted (see Adoption in Rome) by Publius Cornelius Scipio, the eldest son of Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus, and his name was changed to Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus.
In 151, a time of disaster for the Romans in Spain, he voluntarily offered his services in that province and developed an influence over the native tribes similar to that which Scipio Africanus, his grandfather by adoption, had acquired nearly 60 years before. In the next year an appeal was made to him by the Carthaginians to act as mediator between them and the Numidian prince Massinissa, who, supported by a party at Rome, was incessantly encroaching on Carthaginian territory. In 149 war was declared by Rome, and a force sent to besiege Carthage. In the early operations of the war, which went altogether against the Romans, Scipio Aemilianus, though a subordinate officer, distinguished himself repeatedly, and in 147 he was elected consul, while yet under the legal age, in order that he might hold the supreme command. After a year of desperate fighting and splendid heroism on the part of the defenders he conquered Carthage, and at the Senate's bidding levelled it to the ground. On his return to Rome he celebrated a splendid Triumph, having also established a personal claim to his adoptive agnomen of Africanus. In 142, during his censorship, he endeavoured to check the growing luxury and immorality of the period. In 139 he was unsuccessfully accused of high treason by Tiberius Claudius Asellus, whom he had degraded when censor. The speeches delivered by him on that occasion (now lost) were considered brilliant. In 134 he was again consul, with the province of Spain, where a demoralized Roman army was vainly attempting the conquest of Numantia on the Durius (Duero) and the closing of the Numantine War. After devoting several months to restoring the discipline of his troops, he reduced the city by blockade. The fall of Numantia in 133 established the Roman dominion in the province of Hither Spain. For his services Scipio Aemilianus received the additional agnomen of "Numantinus". Scipio Aemilianus himself, though not in sympathy with the extreme conservative party, was decidedly opposed to the schemes of the Gracchi (whose sister Sempronia was his wife). When he heard of the death of Tiberius Gracchus, he is said to have quoted the line from the Odyssey (i. 47), "So perish all who do the like again"; after his return to Rome he was publicly asked by the tribune Gaius Papirius Carbo what he thought of the fate of Gracchus, and replied that he was justly slain. This gave dire offence to the popular party, which was now led by his bitterest foes. Soon afterwards, in 129, on the morning of the day on which he had intended to make a speech in reference to the agrarian proposals of the Gracchi, he was found dead in bed. The mystery of his death was never solved, and there were political reasons for letting the matter drop, but there is little doubt that he was assassinated by one of the supporters of the Gracchi, probably Carbo, whom Cicero expressly accused of the crime.


Scipio looked over the city which had flourished for over seven hundred years since its foundation, which had ruled over such extensive territories, islands, and seas, and been as rich in arms, fleets, elephants, and money as the greatest empires, but which had surpassed them in daring and high courage, since though deprived of all its arms and ships it had yet withstood a great siege and famine for three years, and was now coming to an end in total destruction; and he is said to have wept and openly lamented the fate of his enemy. After meditating a long time on the fact that not only individuals but cities, nations, and empires must all inevitably come to an end, and on fate of Troy, that once glorious city, on the fall of the Assyrian, Median, and Persian empires, and on the more recent destruction of the brilliant empire of the Macedonians, deliberately or subconsciously he quoted the words of Hector from Homer--'The day shall come when sacred Troy shall fall, and King Priam and all his warrior people with him.' And when Polybius, who was with him, asked him what he meant, he turned and took him by the hand, saying: 'This is a glorious moment, Polybius; and yet I am seized with fear and foreboding that some day the same fate will befall my own country.


Scipio Aemilianus, great general and great man as he was, is forever associated with the destruction of Carthage. Although he dutifully carried out the will of the Senate, the horror he expressed at its fate speaks to his humanity. He was a man of culture and refinement; he gathered round him such men as the Greek historian Polybius, the philosopher Panaetius, and the poets Lucilius and Terence. At the same time he had all the virtues of an old-fashioned Roman, according to Polybius and Cicero, the latter of whom gives an appreciation of him in his De republica, in which Scipio Aemilianus is the chief speaker. As a speaker he seems to have been no less distinguished than as a soldier. He spoke remarkably good and pure Latin, and he particularly enjoyed serious and intellectual conversation. After the capture of Carthage he gave back to the Greek cities of Sicily the works of art of which Carthage had robbed them. He did not avail himself of the many opportunities he must have had of amassing a fortune. Though politically opposed to the Gracchi, he cannot be said to have been a foe to the interests of the people. He was, in fact, a moderate man, in favor of conciliation, and he was felt by the best men to be a safe political adviser, but as often happens to moderate men in radical times he ended disliked by both parties.
Despite moderation in policy, his oratory was noted for its sharp witticisms, a number of which have been quoted in various sources (Astin, Appendix II). Astin suggests that while his biting comments were doubtless appreciated by the crowds, they could have also had the effect of making enemies out of political opponents.

Chapter 23 Ancient History Terms

Xanthippus was a Greek (possibly Spartan) mercenary general hired by the Carthaginians to aid in their war against the Romans during the First Punic War. He trained Carthaginian soldiers and led them into the battle of Tunis, where Carthaginian forces routed the Roman expeditionary force and captured the Roman consul Marcus Atilius Regulus in 255 BC.
Xanthippus is credited with the Carthaginian formation, cavalry split between the two wings, mercenary infantry on their right, with a hastily raised phalanx of civilians in the centre and a line of elephants in front of the infantry, which defeated the Romans formed in their normal formation, with the outnumbered cavalry on the wings and legionary infantry in the centre. He also realised the mistakes the Carthaginians were making by avoiding open ground (because of the Romans' superior infantry) which restricted the Carthaginian cavalry and elephants (the strongest parts of their armies).
MARCUS ATILIUS REGULUS, Roman general and consul (for the second time) in the ninth year of the First Punic War (256 B.C.). He was one of the commanders in the Punic naval expedition which shattered the Carthaginian fleet at Ecnomus, and landed an army on Carthaginian territory (see Punic Wars). The invaders were so successful that the other consul, L. Manlius Vulso, was recalled to Rome, Regulus being left behind to finish the war. After a severe defeat at Adys near Carthage, the Carthaginians were inclined for peace, but the terms proposed by Regulus were so harsh that they resolved to continue the war. In 255, Regulus was completely defeated and taken prisoner by the Spartan Xanthippus. There is no further trustworthy information about him. According to tradition, he remained in captivity until 250, when after the defeat of the Carthaginians at Panormus he was sent to Rome on parole to negotiate a peace or exchange of prisoners. On his arrival he strongly urged the senate to refuse both proposals, and returning to Carthage was tortured to death (Horace, Odes, iii. 5). This story made Regulus to the later Romans the type of heroic endurance; but most historians regard it as insufficiently attested, Polybius being silent. The tale was probably invented by the annalists to excuse the cruel treatment of the Carthaginian prisoners by the Romans
Hamilcar Barca or Barcas (~270228 BC) was a Carthaginian general and statesman, leader of the Barcid family, and father of Hannibal.
Milcar is perhaps the same as Mel karth, the Tyrian god. Baraq means "lightning" in Canaanite.
He distinguished himself during the First Punic War in 247 BC, when he took over the chief command in Sicily at a time when the island was almost completely in the hands of the Romans. Landing suddenly on the north-west of the island with a small mercenary force he seized a strong position on Mt. Erote (Monte Pellegrino, near Palermo), and not only maintained himself against all attacks, but carried his raids as far as the coast of south Italy.
In 244 BC he transferred his army to a similar position on the slopes of Mt. Eryx (Monte San Giuliano), from which he was able to lend support to the besieged garrison in the neighbouring town of Drepanum (Trapani). By a provision of the peace of 241 BC Hamilcar's unbeaten force was allowed to depart from Sicily without any token of submission.
Upon returning to Africa, his troops, which had been kept together only by his personal authority and by the promise of good pay, broke out into open mutiny when their rewards were withheld by Hamilcar's opponents among the governing aristocracy, starting the conflict later named Mercenary War. The serious danger into which Carthage was brought by the failure of the aristocratic generals was averted by Hamilcar, whom the government in this crisis could not but reinstate. By the power of his personal influence among the mercenaries and the surrounding African peoples, and by superior strategy, he speedily crushed the revolt (237 BC).
After this success Hamilcar enjoyed such influence among the popular and patriotic party that his opponents could not prevent him being raised to a virtual dictatorship. After recruiting and training a new army in some Numidian forays he led on his own responsibility an expedition into Hispania (236 BC), where he hoped to gain a new empire to compensate Carthage for the loss of Sicily and Sardinia, and to serve as a base for a campaign of vengeance against the Romans.
In eight years by force of arms and diplomacy he secured an extensive territory in Hispania, but his premature death in battle (228 BC) prevented him from completing the conquest. Hamilcar stood out far above the Carthaginians of his age in military and diplomatic skill and in strength of patriotism; in these qualities he was surpassed only by his son Hannibal, whom he had imbued with his own deep hatred of Rome and trained to be his successor in the conflict.
He is sometimes confused with Hamilcar, another Carthaginian general.
Hannibal Barca (247 BCc. 183 BC;[1][2][3][4][5] sometimes referred to as Hǎnnibal Barca) was a Carthaginian politician and statesman who is popularly credited as one of the finest military commanders in history. He lived in a period of tension in the Mediterranean, with both Carthage and Rome (then the Roman Republic) vying for control of the region. Considered by many as the greatest hero of Carthage, he is best known for his achievements in the Second Punic War, when he marched an army, which famously included war elephants, from Iberia over the Pyrenees and the Alps into northern Italy.
During his invasion of Italy he defeated the Romans in a series of battles, out of which the most famous included the Battles of Trebia, Trasimene and Cannae. After Cannae he seized the second largest city in Italy, Capua, but he lacked the strength necessary to attack the city of Rome itself. He maintained an army in Italy for more than a decade afterward, never losing a major engagement, but never able to push the war through to a conclusion. During that period of time, the Roman armies regrouped. A Roman counter-invasion of North Africa forced him to return to Carthage, where he was defeated in the Battle of Zama. The defeat forced the Carthaginian Senate to send him into exile. During this exile, he lived at the Seleucid court, where he acted as military advisor to Antiochus III in his war against Rome. Defeated in a naval battle, Hannibal fled again, this time to the Bithynian court. When the Romans demanded his surrender, he preferred to commit suicide rather than submit.
Hannibal is universally ranked as one of the greatest military commanders and tacticians in history. Military historian Theodore Ayrault Dodge once famously christened Hannibal the "father of strategy"[6] for the reason that even his greatest enemy, Rome, came to adopt elements of his military tactics in their strategic canon. This praise has earned him a strong reputation in the modern world and he was regarded as a "gifted strategist" by men like Napoleon Bonaparte and the Duke of Wellington. He has also been the basis for a number of films and documentaries.
Saguntum During the 5th century BC, the Celtiberian built a walled settlement on the hill overseeing the plain; a stretch of cyclopean limestone slabs from the former temple of Diana, survives, close to the modern church of Santa Maria, but the settlement site is still older. The city traded with Greek and Phoenician coastal colonies, and under their influence, minted its own coins. By (219 BC) Saguntum was a large and commercially prosperous town, which sided with the local Greek colonists and Rome against Carthage, and drew Hannibal's first assault, his siege of Saguntum, the opening move of the Second Punic War. After a harsh resistance of several months, related by the Roman historian Livy, Saguntum was captured in 218 by the armies of Hannibal.

Tiberius Sempronius Longus may refer to:
Tiberius Sempronius Longus (consul 218 BCE), who fought Hannibal's forces in the Second Punic War
His son, Tiberius Sempronius Longus (consul 194 BCE), who defended Roman settlements from the Gauls
Gaius Flaminius Nepos was a politician and consul of the Roman Republic in the 3rd century BC. He was the greatest popular leader to challenge the authority of the Senate before the Gracchi a century later.
In the aftermath of the First Punic War, Flaminius, a novus homo, was the leader of a reform movement which sought to reorganize state land in Italy. As tribune of the plebs in 232 BC, he passed a plebiscite which divided the land south of Ariminum, which had been conquered from the Gauls decades before, and gave it to poor families whose farms had fallen into ruin during the war. The Senate was opposed to this and he did not consult them, contrary to the constitution and tradition.
Flaminius was governor of Sicily in 227. Meanwhile, the reorganization of the land contributed to a renewed attack on Roman territory by the Gauls, whom the Romans finally defeated at the Battle of Telamon in 224. In 223 Flaminius was elected consul for the first time, and with Publius Furius Philus he forced the Gauls to submit to Rome, creating the province of Cisalpine Gaul.
In 221 Flaminius was magister equitum to Marcus Minucius Rufus, then in 220 chosen as censor along with Lucius Aemilius Papus. During his term he arranged for the Via Flaminia to be built from Rome to Ariminum, established colonies at Cremona and Placentia, reorganized the Centuriate Assembly to give the poorer classes more voting power, and built the Circus Flaminius on the Campus Martius. In 218, while serving in the Senate, he was the only senator to support the Lex Claudia, which prohibited senators from participating in overseas trade.
In 217, during the invasion of Italy by Hannibal, he was re-elected consul with Gnaeus Servilius, in what was considered a rebuke of the Senate's prosecution of the war. Flaminius raised new legions and marched north to meet Hannibal, but was ambushed at Lake Trasimene. The army was destroyed and Flaminius was killed. His supporters in the Senate began to lose power to the more aristocratic factions, and the Romans feared Hannibal would besiege their city. The Senate appointed as dictator Fabius Maximus.
Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus (c. 275 BC-203 BC), called Cunctator (the Delayer), was a Roman politician and soldier, born in Rome around 275 BC and died in Rome in 203 BC. He was consul five times (233 BC, 228 BC, 215 BC, 214 BC and 209 BC) and was twice dictator in 221 and again in 217 BC. He reached the office of censor in 230 BC. His epithet Cunctator (akin to the English noun cunctation) means "delayer" in Latin, and refers to his tactics in deploying the troops during the Second Punic War. His cognomen Verrucosus means warty, a reference to the wart above his upper lip.
Gaius Terentius Varro was a Roman consul and commander. Along with his colleague, Lucius Aemilius Paullus, he commanded at the Battle of Cannae during the Second Punic War, in 216 BC, against the Carthaginian general Hannibal. The battle proved to be a decisive Roman defeat.
Prior to being consul, he had been a praetor in 218 BC. He was elected proconsul in Picenum from 215213 BC, and in 208207 BC, as propraetor he held Etruria against Hannibal's younger brother Hasdrubal Barca. He went to Africa, in 200 BC as ambassador.
The Battle of Zama, generally accepted to have been fought on or around October 19 of 202 BC, was the final and decisive battle of the Second Punic War. A Roman army led by Scipio Africanus defeated a Carthaginian force led by Hannibal Barca. Soon after this defeat on their home ground, the Carthaginian senate sued for peace, ending the 17-year war.

Marcus Porcius Cato (Latin: M·PORCIVS·M·F·CATO[1]) (234 BC, Tusculum149 BC) was a Roman statesman, surnamed the Censor (Censorius), Sapiens, Priscus, or the Elder (Major), to distinguish him from Cato the Younger (his great-grandson).
He came of an ancient plebeian family, noted for some military services, but not ennobled by the discharge of the higher civil offices. He was bred, after the manner of his Latin forefathers, to agriculture, to which he devoted himself when not engaged in military service. But, having attracted the notice of Lucius Valerius Flaccus, he was brought to Rome, and became successively quaestor (204 BC), aedile (199 BC), praetor (198 BC), and finally consul (195 BC) together with his old patron.



Suffet In the various independent city states constituting Phoenicia proper (coasts of present Lebanon and Syria) and its "Punic" Mediterranean colonies such as a shofet (in Punic, suffet or suffete) was a non-royal magistrate granted control over a city-state, sometimes functioning much in the same way as a Roman dictator.
Following the overthrow of its monarchy in the 400s BC, Carthage, a former colony but the only Phoenician state that had kept full control over its own colonies and thus build up the only 'empire' (but republican and depending on mercenaries) able to threaten Rome's hegemony, was ruled by a number of aristocratic councils presided over colleagially by two suffetes, who served in similar capacity to Roman consuls.

Corsica (French: Corse; Corsican: Corsica) is the fourth largest island in the Mediterranean Sea (after Sicily, Sardinia, and Cyprus). It is located west of Italy, southeast of France, and north of the island of Sardinia.
Corsica is one of the 26 régions of France, although strictly speaking Corsica is called a "territorial collective" (collectivité territoriale) by law. As a territorial collective, it enjoys powers slightly more important than other French régions, but for the most part its status is quite similar to the status of the other régions. Corsica is referred to as a "région" in common speech, and is almost always listed among the other régions of France. Although the island is separated from the continental mainland by the Ligurian Sea, politically Corsica is considered part of Metropolitan France.
Corsica is famed as the birthplace of Napoléon Bonaparte.
Hiero II, tyrant of Syracuse from 270 to 215 BC, was the illegitimate son of a Syracusan noble, Hierocles, who claimed descent from Gelo. He was a former general of Pyrrhus of Epirus and an important figure of the First Punic War.
On the departure of Pyrrhus from Sicily (275 BC) the Syracusan army and citizens appointed him commander of the troops. He strengthened his position by marrying the daughter of Leptines, the leading citizen. In the meantime, the Mamertines, a body of Campanian mercenaries who had been employed by Agathocles, had seized the stronghold of Messana, and proceeded in harassing the Syracusans. They were finally defeated in a pitched battle near Mylae by Hiero, who was only prevented from capturing Messana by Carthaginian interference. His grateful countrymen then made him tyrant (270).
In 264 BC he again returned to the attack, and the Mamertines called in the aid of Rome. Hiero at once joined the Punic leader Hanno, who had recently landed in Sicily; but being defeated by the consul Appius Claudius Caudex, he withdrew to Syracuse. Pressed by the Roman forces, in 263 he was compelled to conclude a treaty with Rome, by which he was to rule over the south-east of Sicily and the eastern coast as far as Tauromenium (Polybius i. 8-16; Zonaras Viii. 9).
From this time till his death in 215 BC he remained loyal to the Romans, and frequently assisted them with men and provisions during the Punic wars (Livy xxi. 49-51, xxii. 37, xxiii. 21). He kept up a powerful fleet for defensive purposes, and employed his famous kinsman Archimedes in the construction of those engines that, at a later date, played so important a part during the siege of Syracuse by the Romans
Appius Claudius Caudex was a patrician member of the Claudii. He was the grandson of Appius Claudius Caecus through his father Gaius, and served as consul in 264 BC.
In that year, he drew Rome into conflict with Carthage over possession of Sicily. In 265 BC, Hiero II of Syracuse had attacked Messina in an attempt to recapture it from the Mamertines, mercenaries from Campania who had taken it from him some years before. The Mamertines allied with a nearby Carthaginian fleet and held off the Syracusans, but when the Carthaginians did not leave, the Mamertines appealed to Rome in 264 BC.
Some senators were opposed to helping them, but Appius Claudius persuaded the citizens to support them. He led a force to Messina, and as the Mamertines had convinced the Carthaginians to withdraw he met with only a symbolic resistance. The Mamertines handed the city over to Appius Claudius, but the Carthaginians returned to set up a blockade. The Syracusans, meanwhile, were also stationed outside the city. Claudius tried to send ambassadors to both the Carthaginians and the Syracusans, but he was ignored. He then led his troops outside the city defeated the Syracusans in battle, and Hiero retreated back to Syracuse. The next day Claudius also defeated the Carthaginians.
This dispute was one of the immediate causes of the First Punic War.
His son was Publius Claudius Pulcher, consul in 249 BC.
A corvus (meaning "raven" in Latin) was a Roman military boarding device used in naval warfare during the First Punic War against Carthage.
In the Book III of his History, Polybius describes the corvus like a bridge 1.2 m (4 ft) wide and 10.9 m (36 ft) long, with a small parapet on both sides. The engine was probably used in the prow of the ship, where a system of pulleys and a pole allowed the bridge to be raised and lowered. There was a heavy spike shaped as a bird's beak on the underside of the device, hence the name "raven". The spike was designed to pierce the enemy ship's deck when the corvus was lowered. This allowed a firm grip between the vessels and a boarding route for the legionaries.
In the 3rd century BC, Rome was not a naval power and had little or no experience in war at sea. In fact, before the first Punic war, the Roman Republic had not campaigned outside the Italian Peninsula. The Republic's military strength was on land, and her greatest assets were the discipline and courage of her soldiers. The corvus allowed her to use her army against the superior Carthaginian navy. The Romans' application of boarding tactics worked; they won several battles, most notably those of Mylae, Sulci, Tyndaris, and Ecnomus. Despite its advantages, the corvus had serious drawbacks: modern enactments show that its weight on the prow compromised the ship's navigability. Romans lost almost two entire fleets to storms in 255 and in 249 BC, largely due to the instability caused by the device. These losses were probably the main reason for the abandonment of the corvus in ship design by the end of the war. As Roman Naval tactics improved and her crews became more experienced, the advantage of the corvus in battle no longer outweighed the risk involved in using it. It is not mentioned in period sources after the battle of Ecnomus and apparently the battle of the Aegates Islands that decided the first Punic war was won without them; however an evolution of the corvus, called arpax, was used in the battle of Naulochus.
Numidia was an ancient Berber kingdom in North Africa that later became a Roman province, and is no longer in existence today. It was located on the eastern coast of modern day Algeria, bordered by the Roman province of Mauretania (west coast of modern Algeria) to the west, the Roman province of Africa (modern day Tunisia) to the east, the Mediterranean Sea to the north, and the Sahara Desert to the south.
Hasdrubal the Fair (d. 221 BC) was a Carthaginian leader.
He was a son-in-law of Hamilcar Barca, who followed the latter in his campaign against the governing aristocracy at Carthage at the close of the First Punic War, and in his subsequent career of conquest in Hispania. After Hamilcar's death (228 BC) Hasdrubal, who succeeded him in the command, extended the newly acquired empire by skilful diplomacy, and consolidated it by the foundation of Carthago Nova (Cartagena) as the capital of the new province, and by a treaty with the Roman Republic which fixed the Ebro as the boundary between the two powers. He was killed by a Celtic assassin.
Hasdrubal Barca (d. 207 BC) was a Carthaginian general in the Second Punic War. He was the second son of Hamilcar Barca, and younger brother of Hannibal.


Hasdrubal Barca
Hasdrubal was present when the Spanish ambushed the Carthaginian forces at Acre Luce. He along with his brother Hannibal escaped, Hamilcar led the Spanish in the opposite direction and drowned in the River Jucar.
Hannibal, when he set out for Italy, left a force of 13,000 infantry, 2,550 cavalry and 21 elephants in Spain. The Punic navy had a fleet of 50 Quinqueremes and 5 Triremes stationed there. However, only 32 Quinqueremes were manned at the start of the Second Punic War
Left in command of Hispania when Hannibal departed to Italy in 218 BC, Hasdrubal was destined to fight for six years against the brothers Gnaeus and Publius Cornelius Scipio. The expedition Gnaeus Scipio in 218 BC had caught the Carthaginians by surprise, and before Hasrdrubal could join Hanno, the Carthaginian commander on the North of Ebro River, the Romans had fought and won the Battle of Cissa and established their army at Tarraco and their fleet at Emporiae. Hasdrubal raided the Romans with a flying column, which inflicted severe losses and on their naval crews and reduced the fighting strength to 35 ships. This loss was offset by the arrival of an allied Greek contingent from the city of Massilia.
In the spring of 217 BC, Hasdrubal led a joint expedition north to fight the Romans. Gnaeus Scipio surprised the Carthaginian fleet under Himilco and crushed it at the Battle of Ebro River. Hasdrubal retreated without fighting. The year 216 was spent quelling an uprising of Spanish tribes, possibility the Trudenani around the area near Gades.
Hasdrubal was reinforced by 4,000 infantry and 500 cavalry and was ordered by the Carthaginian senate to march to Italy in the same year. He left Himilco in charge at Cartagena and marched for the Ebro river, but was heavily defeated in the Battle of Dertosa in the spring of 215 BC. This defeat prevented reinforcements reaching Hannibal from both Spain and Africa at a critical moment of the War, when the Carthaginians held the upper hand in Italy. The Carthaginians were forced to contest the Romans in the area between the Ebro and Jucor rivers.
This defeat also led to Hanno the Great, Mago Barca and Hasdrubal Gisco arriving in Spain with three armies and ending the undisputed command of the Barcid family in Spain. The Carthaginains fought the Scipio brothers and had on the whole the worst of the conflict between 215 and 212 BC. At the instigation of the Romans, Syphax, one of the kings of the Numidian tribes, attacked Carthaginian territories in 213/212 BC. The situation in Spain was suffuciantly under control, because Hasdrubal crossed over to Africa and crushed the threat of Syphax. The aid of Masinissa, a Numidian prince, was invaluable during this episode, and he crossed over to Spain with Hasdrubal after the African expedition ended with 3,000 Numidian cavalry.
In late 212 BC Hasdrubal acted with imagination and initive, and with timely cooperation from Mago and Hasdrubal Gisco, completely routed his opponents at the Battle of the Upper Baetis, destroying the majority of the Roman army in Spain and killing both the Scipios. Carthaginians gained control of Spain up to the Ebro as a result of this vicory. Lack of cooperation between the Carthginian generals after the battle led the surviving Roman force of 8,000 surviving north of the river Ebro. The Romans reinforced this detachment with 10,000 troops under Cladius Nero in 211 BC and with another 10,000 soldiers under Scipio Africanus Major in 210 BC, who spent the year training his army and improving his diplomatic contacts.
Hasdrubal was subsequently outgeneralled by Scipio Africanus Major, who in 209 BC captured Carthago Nova and gained other advantages. Hasdrubal was defeated by Scipio at the Battle of Baecula, but managed to retreat with 2/3 of his army intact.
In the same year he was summoned to join his brother in Italy. He eluded Scipio by crossing the Pyrenees at their western extremity, and, making his way thence through Gaul and the Alps in safety, penetrated far into Central Italy in 207 BC. He was ultimately checked by two Roman armies, and being forced to give battle was decisively defeated at the Battle of the Metaurus. Hasdrubal himself fell in the fight; his head was cut off and thrown into Hannibal's camp as a sign of his utter defeat, in stark contrast of Hannibal's treatment of the bodies of fallen Roman Consuls.
It is hard to judge the true ability of Hasdrubal Barca as a general, as we know more about his defeats than his successes.
The Ebro (Catalan: Ebre) is Spain's most voluminous and second longest river. It starts at Fontibre (in the province of Cantabria) and passes Miranda de Ebro, Logroño, Zaragoza, Flix, Tortosa, and Amposta before ending in a delta on the Mediterranean Sea in the province of Tarragona.
Publius Cornelius Scipio (died 211 BC) was a general and statesman of the Roman Republic.
A member of the Cornelia gens, Scipio served as consul in 218 BC, the first year of the Second Punic War, and sailed with an army from Pisa to Massilia (today Marseille), with the view of arresting Hannibal's advance on Italy. Failing, however, to meet his enemy, he hastened to return by sea to Cisalpine Gaul, having sent his army on to Hispania under the command of his older brother Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus, with instructions to hold the Carthaginian forces there in check.
On his return to Italy he at once advanced to meet Hannibal. In a sharp cavalry engagement near the Ticinus, a tributary of the Po river, he was defeated and severely wounded. In December of the same year, he again witnessed the complete defeat of the Roman army at the Trebia, when his fellow consul Tiberius Sempronius Longus insisted on fighting contrary to his advice.
Despite the military defeats, he still retained the confidence of the Roman people: his term of command was extended and the following year found him in Hispania with his brother Calvus, winning victories over the Carthaginians and strengthening Rome's position in the Iberian peninsula. He continued the Iberian campaigns until 211 when he was killed in the defeat of his army on the upper Baetis river, the same year Calvus and his army was destroyed at Ilorci near Carthago Nova. The details of these campaigns are not accurately known, but it seems that the ultimate defeat and death of the two Scipiones was due to the desertion of the Celtiberians, bribed by Hasdrubal Barca, Hannibal's brother.
He was the son of Lucius Cornelius Scipio, and he was the father of Scipio Africanus Major, whose original name was likewise Publius Cornelius Scipio.
The Battle of the Trebia (or Trebbia) was the first major battle of the Second Punic War, fought between the Carthaginian forces of Hannibal and the Roman Republic in 218 BC.

The Battle of Lake Trasimene (June 24, 217 BC, April on the Julian calendar) was a Roman defeat in the Second Punic War between the Carthaginians under Hannibal and the Romans under the consul Gaius Flaminius. The battle is perhaps one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history.

Lucius Aemilius Paullus (d. 216 BC) was a Roman general. He was consul twice, in 219 and 216 BC.
He served his first consulship with Marcus Livius Salinator. During this year, he defeated Demetrius of Pharos, in the Second Illyrian War and forced him to flee to the court of Philip V of Macedon. Upon his return to Rome, he was awarded a triumph. He was subsequently charged, along with his colleague, with unfairly dividing the spoils, although he was acquitted.
During the Second Punic War, he was made consul a second time and served with Gaius Terentius Varro. He shared the command of the army with Varro at Battle of Cannae. Varro lead out the troops against the advice of Paullus and the battle became a crushing defeat for the Romans. Paullus died in the battle while Varro got away.
He was the father of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus and his daughter, Aemilia Tertia, married Scipio Africanus. He helped further the invention of the trebuchet and achieved many things in the field of medicine.
Cannae (mod. Canne della Battaglia), an ancient village of the Apulia region of south east Italy. It is situated near the river Aufidus (mod. Ofanto), on a hill on the right bank, 9.6 km (6 miles) southwest from its mouth, and 9 km southwest from Barletta.
It is primarily known for the Battle of Cannae, in which the Romans were defeated by Hannibal in 216 BC (see Punic Wars). There is a considerable controversy as to whether the battle took place on the right or the left bank of the river.
In later times the place became a municipium, and unimportant Roman remains still exist upon the hill known as Monte di Canne. In the Middle Ages it became a bishopric, but was destroyed in 1276.
Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus Major (Latin: P·CORNELIVS·P·F·L·N·SCIPIO·AFRICANVS¹) (235183 BC) was a general in the Second Punic War and statesman of the Roman Republic. He was best known for defeating Hannibal of Carthage, a feat that earned him the surname Africanus, the nickname 'the Roman Hannibal' and recognition as one of the finest commanders in military history.
Scipio (L., rod or staff) was born in 236 BC in Rome into the Scipio branch of the Cornelii family. Several ancestors had been consuls successively, and his great-grandfather, Lucius Cornelius Scipio Barbatus, had been patrician censor in 280 BC. The Cornelii were counted among the five major patrician families —the others being the Fabii, the Aemilii, the Claudii, and the Valerii — and at the time Scipio Africanus lived, the Scipiones were probably its most prominent branch.
Scipio was the elder son of Publius Cornelius Scipio, praetor and consul, by his wife Pomponia, who was apparently of a prominently knightly and plebian family. Scipio was known to have visited the temple daily as he took dreams about gods and omens seriously. He is also thought to have consulted with, or at least informed his mother before deciding to run for curule aedile, the most junior magistrate who was entitled to enter the Senate. Scipio ran for this office at the age of 24. His younger brother was Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus. Little else is known about his childhood.
[edit]
Early Military Service
At an early age, Scipio joined the Roman struggle against Carthage in the Second Punic War. At some point he is said to have promised his father to continue the struggle against Carthage all his life, showing similar dedication to that of his enemy, Hannibal.
The young Scipio survived the disastrous battles at Ticinus, Trebia and Cannae. According to one tradition, he saved his father's life when he was 18, at the Battle of Ticinus. Scipio's would-be father-in-law Lucius Aemilius Paullus was killed in 216 BC at the third of these battles, the Battle of Cannae. Despite these defeats at the hands of the Carthaginians, Scipio remained focused on securing Roman victory.
On hearing that Lucius Caecilius Metellus and other politicians were at the point of surrender, Scipio gathered what his follower and stormed into the meeting, where at sword-point he forced all present to swear that they would continue in faithful service to Rome. Fortunately, the Roman Senate was of like mind and refused to entertain thoughts of peace despite the great losses Rome had taken in the war (approximately one-fifth of the men of military age had died within a few years).
Scipio offered himself as a candidate for the curule aedileship in the year 212 BC, apparently to assist his less popular cousin, Lucius Cornelius, who was also standing for election. The Tribunes of the Plebs (elected representatives from the Plebian Assembly) objected to his candidacy, saying that he could not be allowed to stand because he had not yet reached the legal age - curule aediles were automatically entitled to enter the Senate and the legal age for Senate membership was 30. Scipio's reply was, "If the quirites (the Roman citizens) are unanimous in their desire to appoint me Aedile, I am quite old enough..."[citation needed] Scipio, already known for his bravery and patriotism, was elected unanimously and the Tribunes abandoned their opposition.
[edit]
Campaign in Hispania


Nicholas Poussin's painting of the Continence of Scipio, depicting his return of a captured young woman to her fiancé, having refused to accept her from his troops as a prize of war.
In 211 BC both Scipio's father, Publius Scipio, and uncle, Gnaeus Cornelius Scipio Calvus, were killed in battle against Hannibal's brother, Hasdrubal Barca. In the following year Scipio offered himself for the command of the new army which the Romans resolved to send to Hispania. In spite of his youth, his noble demeanor and enthusiastic language had made so great an impression that he was unanimously elected to be sent there as proconsul. In the year of Scipio's arrival (210 BC) all of Hispania south of the Ebro river was under Carthaginian control. Hannibal's brothers Hasdrubal and Mago, and Hasdrubal Gisco were the generals of the Carthaginian forces in Hispania, and Rome was aided by the inability of these three figures to act in concert. The Carthaginians were also preoccupied with revolts in Africa.
Scipio landed at the mouth of the Ebro and was able to surprise and capture Carthago Nova, the headquarters of the Carthaginian power in Hispania. He obtained a rich cache of war stores and supplies, and an excellent harbor and base of operations. Scipio's humanitarian conduct toward prisoners and hostages in Hispania helped in portraying the Romans as liberators as opposed to conquerors. Livy tells the story of the capture of a beautiful woman by his troops, who offered her to Scipio as a prize of war. Scipio, astonished by her beauty, thanked his troops but discovered that the woman was betrothed to a local chieftain. He returned her to her fiancé, along with the money that had been offered by her parents to ransom her. While Scipio was long known for his great chivalry, Scipio doubtless also realized that the Senate's first priority was the war in Italy, and in the midst of the Carthaginian base in Hispania, he was to be outnumbered without much hope of reinforcement. It was paramount therefore that Scipio cooperate with local chieftains to both supply and reinforce his small army. The woman's fiance (who soon married her) naturally brought over his tribe to support the Roman armies.[citation needed]
In 209 BC Scipio fought his first set piece battle, driving back Hasdrubal Barca from his position at Baecula on the upper Guadalquivir. Scipio feared that the armies of Mago and Gisco would enter the field and surround his small army. Scipio's objective was, therefore, to quickly eliminate one of the armies to give him the luxury of dealing with the other two piecemeal. The battle was decided by a determined Roman infantry charge up the center of the Carthaginian position. Roman losses are uncertain but may have been considerable in light of an effort by the infantry to scale an elevation defended by Carthaginian light infantry. Scipio then orchestrated a frontal attack by the rest of his infantry to draw out the remainder of the Carthaginian forces.
Hasdrubal had not noticed Scipio's hidden reserves of cavalry moving behind enemy lines, and a Roman cavalry charge created a double envelopment on either flank led by cavalry commander Gaius Laelius and Scipio himself. This broke the back of Hasdrubal's army and routed his forces -- an impressive feat for the young Roman versus the veteran Carthaginian general. Despite a Roman victory, Scipio was unable to hinder the Carthaginian march to Italy. Much historical criticism has been leveled at his inability to effectively pursue Hasdrubal, who would eventually cross the Alps only to be defeated by Gaius Claudius Nero at the Battle of the Metaurus.
One popular theory for Scipio's failure to pursue Hasdrubal is that Scipio merely wanted the glory of securing Spain, and an extended mountain campaign would have endangered that. Others cite the Roman soldiers' appetite for plunder as preventing him from rallying in pursuit. The most probable explanation from a strategic standpoint is Scipio's unwillingness to risk being trapped between Hasdrubal's army on one side and one or both of Gisgo's and Mago's armies, both of superior numerical strength. Mere days after Hasdrubal's defeat, Mago and Gisgo were able to converge in front of the Roman positions, bringing into question what would have happened had Scipio pursued Hasdrubal.
After winning over a number of Hispanian chiefs Scipio achieved a decisive victory in 206 BC over the full Carthaginian levy at Ilipa (now the city of Alcalá del Río, near Hispalis, now called Seville), which resulted in the evacuation of Hispania by the Punic commanders.
After his rapid success in conquering Spain, and with the idea of striking a blow at Carthage in Africa, Scipio paid a short visit to the Numidian princes Syphax and Massinissa. Numidia was of vital importance to Carthage, supplying both mercenaries and allied forces. In addition to supplying the Numidian cavalry (on which see the Battle of Cannae), Numidia operated as a buffer for vulnerable Carthage. Scipio managed to receive support from both Syphax and Massinissa. Syphax later changed his mind, marrying the beautiful Carthaginian noblewoman Sophonisba, daughter of Hasdrubal the son of Gisco, and fighting alongside his Carthaginian in-laws against Massinissa and Scipio in Africa.
On his return to Hispania, Scipio had to quell a mutiny which had broken out among his troops. Hannibal's brother Hasdrubal had meanwhile marched for Italy, and in 206 BC Scipio himself, having secured the Roman occupation of Hispania by the capture of Gades, gave up his command and returned to Rome.
[edit]
African Campaign
In the following year, 205 BC, Scipio was unanimously elected to the consulship at the age of 31. Scipio wanted to go to Africa, but his jealous enemies in the Roman senate only allowed him to go as far as Sicily and did not grant him an army. Nevertheless, Scipio raised and trained a volunteer army while in Sicily.
By this time Hannibal's movements were restricted to the southwestern toe of Italy. Scipio was intent on transferring the war to Africa, and his great name drew to him a number of volunteers from all parts of Italy. Interestingly, among these volunteers were the shamed survivors of the fiasco at the Battle of Cannae, anxious to once again prove their worth as soldiers. Scipio began creating Sicily as a training camp and a staging point for his conceived invasion.
Scipio realized that the Carthaginian, and especially Numidian superiority in cavalry would prove decisive against the largely infantry forces of the Roman legions. In addition, a large portion of Rome's cavalry were allies of questionable loyalty, or noble equites exempting themselves from being lowly foot soldiers. One anecdote tells of how Scipio pressed into service several hundred Sicilian nobles to create a cavalry force. The Sicilians were quite opposed to this servitude to a foreign occupier (Sicily being under Roman control only since the First Punic War), and protested vigorously. Scipio assented to their exemption from service providing they pay for a horse, equipment, and a replacement rider for the Roman Army. In this way, Scipio created a trained nucleus of cavalry for his African campaign.
The Roman Senate sent a commission of inquiry to Sicily and found that Scipio was at the head of a well-equipped and trained fleet and army. Scipio pressed the Senate for permission to cross into Africa. The conservative branch of the Roman Senate, championed by Fabius Maximus, the Cunctator (Delayer), opposed the mission. Fabius still feared Hannibal's power, and viewed any mission to Africa as dangerous and wasteful to the war effort. Scipio was also harmed by some senators' disdain of his Hellenophile tastes in art, luxuries, and philosophies. The introduction (205 BC) of the Phrygian worship of Cybele and the transference of the image of the goddess herself from Pessinus to Rome to bless the expedition may have affected public opinion against Scipio as well. All Scipio could obtain was permission to cross over from Sicily to Africa if it appeared to be in the interests of Rome, but not financial or military support.
At the commissioners' bidding Scipio sailed in 204 BC and landed near Utica. Carthage, meanwhile, had secured the friendship of the Numidian Syphax, whose advance compelled Scipio to abandon the siege of Utica and dig in on the shore between there and Carthage. The following year he destroyed the combined armies of the Carthaginians and Numidians by approaching by stealth and setting fire to the Carthaginian-Numidian camp, where the combined army became panic stricken and fled only to be destroyed by Scipio's army. Though not a "battle," both Polybius and Livy estimate that the death toll in this single attack exceeded 40,000 Carthaginian and Numidian dead, and more captured.
Historians are roughly equal in their praise and condemnation for this act. Polybius said, "of all the brilliant exploits performed by Scipio this seems to me the most brilliant and more adventurous." On the other hand, one of Hannibal's principal biographers, Theodore Ayrault Dodge, goes so far to suggest that this attack was out of cowardice and spares no more than a page upon the event in total, despite the fact that it secured the siege of Utica and effectively put Syphax out of the war. The irony of Dodge's accusations of Scipio's cowardice is the attack showed traces of Hannibal's penchant for ambush.
Scipio quickly dispatched his two lieutenants, Laelius and Masinissa, to pursue Syphax. These lieutenants ultimately dethroned Syphax, ensuring Prince Masinissa's corronation as King of the Numidians. Carthage, and especially Hannibal himself, had long relied upon these superb natural horsemen who would now fight for Rome and against Carthage.
[edit]
War with Hannibal, the Battle of Zama
With Carthage now deserted by her allies, and surrounded by a veteran and undefeated Roman army which Dodge states was the best ever fielded, Carthage began opening diplomatic channels for negotiation. At this Hannibal Barca returned to Carthage, and despite the moderate terms offered to Carthage by Scipio, Carthage suddenly suspended negotiations and again prepared for war. The army that Hannibal returned with is a subject of much debate. Apologists for Hannibal often claim that his army was mostly Italians pressed into service from Southern Italy, and that most of his elite veterans (and certainly cavalry) were spent. Scipio's advocates tend to be far more suspicious, and believe the number of veteran forces to remain significant.
Hannibal did have a trained pool of soldiers who had fought personally in Italy, as well as eighty massive war elephants. Hannibal could boast a strength of 58,000 infantry and 6,000 cavalry, compared to Scipio's 34,000 infantry and 8,700 cavalry. The two generals met on a plain between Carthage and Utica on October 19, 202 BC at the Zama. Despite mutual admiration, negotiations floundered, due largely to Roman distrust of the Carthaginians as a result of to the Carthaginian attack on Saguntum, the breach of protocols which ended the First Punic War (known as Punic Faith), and a perceived breach in contemporary military etiquette due to Hannibal's numerous ambushes.
The Battle of Zama itself is recounted elsewhere, but it is noteworthy to cite Scipio's contribution to its outcome. Hannibal had arranged his infantry in three phalangial lines designed to overlap the Roman lines. His strategy, so oft reliant upon subtle strategems, was simple: a massive forward attack by the war elephants would create vulnerable gaps in the Roman lines, and these would be attacked from lines of infantry, and supported by cavalry.
Rather than arranging his forces in the traditional manipular lines, which put the velites, principes, and triarii in succeeding lines of 500 men groups, Scipio instead put the maniples in a chequer pattern, with his elite heavy infantry in diagonals. This was done to match the length of the Carthaginian line, but also as a strategem against the war elephants. When the Carthaginian elephants charged, they found well laid traps before the Roman position, and were greeted by Roman trumpeters which drove many back out of confusion and fear. Roman javelins were used to good effect, and the sharp traps caused further disorder among the elephant calvary. Many of the elephants were so distraught that they charged back into their own Carthaginian lines. The Roman infantry was greatly rattled by the elephants, but Massinissa's Numidian and Laelius' Roman cavalry began to charge the opposing cavalry off the field. Both calvary commanders pursued their routing Carthaginian counterparts, leaving the Carthaginian and Roman infantries to engage one another. The resulting infantry clash was fierce and bloody, with neither side achieving local superiority. The Roman infantry had driven off the 2 front lines of the Carthaginian army and in the respite took an opportunity to water. The Roman army was then drawn up in a long line a single soldier deep and then marched towards Hannibals veterans who had not yet taken part in the battle. The final struggle was bitter, and only won when the allied cavalry rallied and returned to the battle field. Charging the rear of Hannibal's army, they caused what many historians have called the "Roman Cannae."
Because of the exertions of Rome and her allies against Carthage many Roman aristocrats, especially Cato, expected Scipio to raze that city to the ground after his successful campaign. However, Scipio dictated extremely moderate terms in contrast to an immoderate Roman Senate. At Scipio's consent Hannibal was allowed to become the civic leader of Carthage as a byproduct of Scipio's moderation (which the Cato family did not forget). Despite his moderation towards the Carthaginians, he was cruel towards the Roman and the Latin deserters: the Latins were beheaded and the Romans crucified.
[edit]
Return to Rome
Scipio was welcomed back to Rome in triumph with the agnomen of Africanus. He refused the many further honours which the people would have thrust upon him such as Consul and Dictator for life. In the year 199 BC, Scipio was elected Censor and for some years afterwards he lived quietly and took no part in politics.
In 193 BC Scipio was one of the commissioners sent to Africa to settle a dispute between Massinissa and the Carthaginians, which the commission did not achieve. This may have been because Hannibal, in the service of Antiochus III of Syria, might have come to Carthage to gather support for a new attack on Italy. In 190 BC, when the Romans declared war against Antiochus III, Publius offered to join his brother Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus, if the Senate entrusted the chief command to him. The two brothers brought the war to a conclusion by a decisive victory at Magnesia in the same year.
Antiochus I Soter (i.e. "Saviour") (324/​323-​262/​261 BCE), was an emperor of the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire. He reigned from 281 - 261 BCE. He was half Persian, his mother Apame being one of those eastern princesses whom Alexander the Great had given as wives to his generals in 324 BCE.
On the assassination of his father Seleucus I in 281 BCE, the task of holding together the empire was a formidable one, and a revolt in Syria broke out almost immediately. With his father's murderer, Ptolemy Keraunos, Antiochus was soon compelled to make peace, abandoning apparently Macedonia and Thrace. In Asia Minor he was unable to reduce Bithynia or the Persian dynasties that ruled in Cappadocia.
In 278 BCE the Gauls broke into Asia Minor, and a victory that Antiochus won over these hordes is said to have been the origin of his title of Soter (Gr. for "saviour").
At the end of 275 BCE the question of Coele-Syria, which had been open between the houses of Seleucus and Ptolemy since the partition of 301 BCE, led to hostilities (the "First Syrian War"). It had been continuously in Ptolemaic occupation, but the house of Seleucus maintained its claim.
War did not materially change the outlines of the two kingdoms, though frontier cities like Damascus and the coast districts of Asia Minor might change hands.
About 262 BCE Antiochus tried to break the growing power of Pergamum by force of arms, but suffered defeat near Sardis and died soon afterwards. His eldest son Seleucus, who had ruled in the east as viceroy from 275 BCE(?) till 268/267 BCE, was put to death in that year by his father on the charge of rebellion. He was succeeded (261 BCE) by his second son Antiochus II Theos.
After the death of his father, Antiochus married his step-mother, Stratonice, daughter of Demetrius Poliorcetes, their son Antiochus II Theos succeeded his father.
Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus Africanus Numantinus (185 - 129 BC) was a leading general and politician of the ancient Roman Republic. As consul he commanded at the final siege and destruction of Carthage in 146 BC, and was a leader of the senators opposed to the Gracchi in 133 BC.
He was born the younger son of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus, the conqueror of Macedonia, and fought when he was 17 years old by his father's side at the Battle of Pydna, which decided the fate of Macedonia and made northern Greece subject to Rome. He was adopted (see Adoption in Rome) by Publius Cornelius Scipio, the eldest son of Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus, and his name was changed to Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus.
In 151, a time of disaster for the Romans in Spain, he voluntarily offered his services in that province and developed an influence over the native tribes similar to that which Scipio Africanus, his grandfather by adoption, had acquired nearly 60 years before. In the next year an appeal was made to him by the Carthaginians to act as mediator between them and the Numidian prince Massinissa, who, supported by a party at Rome, was incessantly encroaching on Carthaginian territory. In 149 war was declared by Rome, and a force sent to besiege Carthage. In the early operations of the war, which went altogether against the Romans, Scipio Aemilianus, though a subordinate officer, distinguished himself repeatedly, and in 147 he was elected consul, while yet under the legal age, in order that he might hold the supreme command. After a year of desperate fighting and splendid heroism on the part of the defenders he conquered Carthage, and at the Senate's bidding levelled it to the ground. On his return to Rome he celebrated a splendid Triumph, having also established a personal claim to his adoptive agnomen of Africanus. In 142, during his censorship, he endeavoured to check the growing luxury and immorality of the period. In 139 he was unsuccessfully accused of high treason by Tiberius Claudius Asellus, whom he had degraded when censor. The speeches delivered by him on that occasion (now lost) were considered brilliant. In 134 he was again consul, with the province of Spain, where a demoralized Roman army was vainly attempting the conquest of Numantia on the Durius (Duero) and the closing of the Numantine War. After devoting several months to restoring the discipline of his troops, he reduced the city by blockade. The fall of Numantia in 133 established the Roman dominion in the province of Hither Spain. For his services Scipio Aemilianus received the additional agnomen of "Numantinus". Scipio Aemilianus himself, though not in sympathy with the extreme conservative party, was decidedly opposed to the schemes of the Gracchi (whose sister Sempronia was his wife). When he heard of the death of Tiberius Gracchus, he is said to have quoted the line from the Odyssey (i. 47), "So perish all who do the like again"; after his return to Rome he was publicly asked by the tribune Gaius Papirius Carbo what he thought of the fate of Gracchus, and replied that he was justly slain. This gave dire offence to the popular party, which was now led by his bitterest foes. Soon afterwards, in 129, on the morning of the day on which he had intended to make a speech in reference to the agrarian proposals of the Gracchi, he was found dead in bed. The mystery of his death was never solved, and there were political reasons for letting the matter drop, but there is little doubt that he was assassinated by one of the supporters of the Gracchi, probably Carbo, whom Cicero expressly accused of the crime.


Scipio looked over the city which had flourished for over seven hundred years since its foundation, which had ruled over such extensive territories, islands, and seas, and been as rich in arms, fleets, elephants, and money as the greatest empires, but which had surpassed them in daring and high courage, since though deprived of all its arms and ships it had yet withstood a great siege and famine for three years, and was now coming to an end in total destruction; and he is said to have wept and openly lamented the fate of his enemy. After meditating a long time on the fact that not only individuals but cities, nations, and empires must all inevitably come to an end, and on fate of Troy, that once glorious city, on the fall of the Assyrian, Median, and Persian empires, and on the more recent destruction of the brilliant empire of the Macedonians, deliberately or subconsciously he quoted the words of Hector from Homer--'The day shall come when sacred Troy shall fall, and King Priam and all his warrior people with him.' And when Polybius, who was with him, asked him what he meant, he turned and took him by the hand, saying: 'This is a glorious moment, Polybius; and yet I am seized with fear and foreboding that some day the same fate will befall my own country.


Scipio Aemilianus, great general and great man as he was, is forever associated with the destruction of Carthage. Although he dutifully carried out the will of the Senate, the horror he expressed at its fate speaks to his humanity. He was a man of culture and refinement; he gathered round him such men as the Greek historian Polybius, the philosopher Panaetius, and the poets Lucilius and Terence. At the same time he had all the virtues of an old-fashioned Roman, according to Polybius and Cicero, the latter of whom gives an appreciation of him in his De republica, in which Scipio Aemilianus is the chief speaker. As a speaker he seems to have been no less distinguished than as a soldier. He spoke remarkably good and pure Latin, and he particularly enjoyed serious and intellectual conversation. After the capture of Carthage he gave back to the Greek cities of Sicily the works of art of which Carthage had robbed them. He did not avail himself of the many opportunities he must have had of amassing a fortune. Though politically opposed to the Gracchi, he cannot be said to have been a foe to the interests of the people. He was, in fact, a moderate man, in favor of conciliation, and he was felt by the best men to be a safe political adviser, but as often happens to moderate men in radical times he ended disliked by both parties.
Despite moderation in policy, his oratory was noted for its sharp witticisms, a number of which have been quoted in various sources (Astin, Appendix II). Astin suggests that while his biting comments were doubtless appreciated by the crowds, they could have also had the effect of making enemies out of political opponents.

Boxer Rebellion

Commercial concessions had been forced on China dating to the end of the Opium Wars (1839-1842), a contrived series of conflicts engineered by British trading interests. France, Germany and Russia later demanded and received similar treatment.
Paramount among the great powers’ requirements was the granting of treaty ports and extraterritorial status.
China was later divided into spheres of influence in the aftermath of the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-95), allowing outside nations even greater latitude. Understandably, the Chinese deeply resented the presence of the great powers and the weakness of their own government. China had effectively lost its independence.
One reaction to this exploitation was the emergence of a clandestine martial arts society referred to by the English as the “Boxers” (their Chinese name being translated as “righteous harmonious fists”). The nativist group launched a series of attacks against foreigners, Chinese Christians and complicit government officials. The high point of the rebellion occurred in mid-1900, when Beijing was occupied by 140,000 Boxers. They laid siege to the British legation, which harbored most of the international community. The entrenched foreigners held out for two months until a hastily arranged multinational military force managed to break the siege, scattering the Boxers.
As a result of the rebellion, China was subjected to even greater humiliation. An indemnity of more than $300 million was levied on the nearly bankrupt nation and the government was forced to allow the permanent quartering of foreign soldiers in Beijing.
The United States attempted to mitigate some of the financial damage by later using much of its share of the reparations to fund scholarships for Chinese students studying in America.
From the international perspective, the Boxer Rebellion increased support for the Open Door policy. The great powers realized that warring among themselves would inhibit their ability to exploit China.


In the fall of 1898, President McKinley stated his desire for the creation of an "open door" that would allow all trading nations access to the Chinese market.


Manchuria, a region in northeastern China that incorporated the provinces of Heilongjiang, Jilin (Kirin or Chi-lin), and Liaoning, had long been attractive to other nations. (See Far Eastern map.)
The Russians, China's neighbor to the north, had occupied the area for several years at the beginning of the 20th century, then in 1929 became embroiled in a dispute with China over control of the Chinese Eastern Railway that crossed Manchuria on its way to Vladivostok. This incident did not erupt into a major conflict, but it did bring to light the shortcomings of the Kellogg-Briand Pact as a means to prevent armed conflict among signatories. U.S. Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson was embarrassingly unsuccessful in restraining the actions of the Soviets, who pointedly noted that they had little interest in following the suggestions of a nation that had denied them diplomatic recognition.
The Chinese also contended with an active Japanese presence in Manchuria that was sanctioned by international agreements. The Japanese controlled the South Manchurian Railroad, had soldiers in place to patrol its tracks and had established a large community of business people on Chinese soil. China was understandably unhappy with the foreign presence, but was too weak and fragmented to resist. By the 1920s, however, nationalist movements were underway.
In September 1931, an explosion damaged a section of the South Manchurian Railroad track — an event sometimes labeled the Mukden Incident. The Japanese military immediately seized the opportunity to move soldiers from a base already established on the Liaodong Peninsula into other areas of South Manchuria. They encountered little Chinese resistance and the highly orchestrated nature of the Japanese move made it evident that it had been planned in advance.
Protests from Secretary Stimson did nothing to halt Japanese expansion. In October, the United States broke with recent policy and accepted an invitation from the League of Nations to sit with the Council in its deliberations on the evolving Manchurian crisis. Prentiss B. Gilbert, already stationed in Geneva, attended the sessions. The Japanese failed to respond to warnings from the international organization and the possibility of imposing economic sanctions was discussed by the delegates. The League hoped to exhaust all avenues of resolution and appointed a commission to travel to China to gather information. In December 1931, the League of Nations called for the creation of a fact-finding commission to travel to the Far East and report on its findings. Japan was supportive of this plan, but China knew that such a delay freed Japanese troops to continue their conquest of additional territory.
Members of the Lytton Commission, named for British diplomat Lord Lytton, were not appointed until January 1932 and did not arrive in Manchuria until April. American General Frank R. McCoy served on the commission.
Meanwhile, in the United States, opinion was divided. The Hoover administration made it clear that economic sanctions were a likely road to war and opposed them, which put the government at odds with a growing number of newspaper editorialists. At the end of December, the president reassured Congress and the public by informing them that U.S. was not bound to take any action in the Far East.
The Japanese continued to expand their military occupation of Manchuria; by early January 1932, effective Chinese resistance was ended. Secretary Stimson used this opportunity to send a note to China and Japan, which stated that the United States would not recognize any agreements made regarding Manchuria that impaired U.S. rights under existing treaties. This policy of non-recognition became known as the Stimson Doctrine.
On January 29, a major Japanese offensive was launched against the city of Shanghai. Thousands of men, women and children were killed in the bombing and subsequent fires. There was widespread international revulsion over the Japanese action, but few were willing to press matters to the brink of war.
Stimson held strong feelings about this situation, but had to heed the president’s warning about pressing the Japanese too hard. In the end, the secretary found an appropriate means to make his point. He sent an open letter to Senator William E. Borah, architect of the earlier Washington Conference, in which he provided a lengthy examination of recent treaties pertaining to the Far East and the development of the Open Door Policy. This summary of U.S. positions was intended not for the Senator’s benefit, but for a broader audience — Japan, Britain, China, the League of Nations and the American public.
In March, Stimson’s “shirtsleeves diplomacy” was rewarded when the Assembly of the League of Nations adopted a resolution containing language similar to that of the Stimson Doctrine. Faced with a united international community that had endorsed non-recognition of Japanese advances, Tokyo backed down commenced a withdrawal of troops from Shanghai that was complete in late May. The immediate war crisis had passed.
Japanese desires to dominate neighboring areas in the Far East remained undiminished, however. On September 15, 1932, Tokyo extended official recognition to Manchukuo, the supposedly independent state that had been created in Manchuria. In truth, Manchukuo was nothing more than a Japanese puppet-state that remained closed to the rest of the world. Only Germany and Italy joined Japan in granting diplomatic recognition. Pu Yi, the sole Manchu dynasty survivor, was installed as the ruler; he was named emperor in 1934.
In October 1932, the Lytton Commission issued its report labeling Japan as the aggressor, but acknowledging that the Japanese had historic special interests in Manchuria. In early 1933, the League of Nations backed the commission's findings and the United States indicated that it was in “substantial accord” with the League. The Japanese were stung by this rebuke and on March 27 they informed the League of their intention to withdraw from the international body.
Relations between Japan and China remained strained in the following years, then finally erupted into full-scale war in 1937. In the minds of a number of authorities, the road to World War II began in Manchuria in 1931, when it became apparent to all that treaties and the efforts of the League of Nations were not sufficient to halt a nation bent on aggression.



Japan had invaded China in 1937, gradually isolating it from the rest of the world except for two tenuous supply lines: A narrow-gauge railway originating in Haiphong, French Indochina; and the Burma Road, an improved highway linking Lashio in British Burma to Kunming in China. Those routes carried the material that made it possible for Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist Chinese government to resist Japanese offensives


British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, swayed by pacifist feelings at home, adopted the policy of appeasement. Chamberlain returned to Britain from the 1938 Munich Conference a hero, proclaiming "peace in our time

Asian History class notes to 9/06/06

Bourgeoisie - Middle class
Proletariat - Working class
Lumpin Proletariat - homeless people or the margins of society. Can include the criminals

Marx thinks it is alienation because workers do not own their own tools and have no means of production.

Capitalism is about making money.

Marx sees the working classes who are powerless and alienated from the system who make less and less.
Marx saw the expansion of misery, so in the future. Its like a ticking bomb and people would rebel in a social revolution.

Marx predicted that socialism was a moment of passage and eventually each worker would eventually produce what they need and you would eventually see the withering of the state and eventually have an Utopian society.

Wade Giles – Mao tse tung
Pinyin – Mao Zedong -- Pinyin is closer to being phonetically correct.

PRC – peoples republic of china

Imperialism – expansion, bringing civilization to the backward peoples, artificial domination by force for economic exploitation.

Nationalism – Pride in ones nation

In the 1960’s it was a big decade for nationalism

Imperialism from the 3rd world perspective is viewed as an evil thing

1820’s the British developed a trading network in China and the particularly traded in Opium

The Emperor of the last Chinese dynasty was of Manchurian decent and therefore was part of the Manchu dynasty and it was the Qing Dynasty and they were deeply opposed to the British export of Opium.

Hong Kong was Britain’s largest trade city in China

Spheres of Influence

Interior of China was still feudal

Bourgeoisie – middle class
Gentry – landlords in the interior of the country
Peasants – most are renters from the Gentry
Empress and her court was in Peeking

Boxers – nationalists – Chinese for Chinese and did not like the Westerners in China
The Boxers killed all of the Westerners that they could kill. The U.S. contributed to the putting down of the Boxers.

John Hay – “Open Door” policy about China and it said the US favored free and independent China with free and open markets for trade.

Mandarins-

By 1900 we got an even weaker central government in China.

Friday, September 22, 2006

The following is a review that I had to write about in my Asian History class. We watched the movie '55 days in Peking'

________________________________________________________________________

Bobby Montgomery
September 19, 2006


A Reflection on the Movie “55 Days in Peking


In the 1963 film “55 days in Peking” about the Boxer invasion of China, Charleston Heston plays a U.S. Army Major, Major Matt Lewis. The film also starred Ava Gardner and David Nevin. Major Lewis was an American and was the main character in the film.

The film “55 Days in Peking” was clearly written to a western audience. The story was told from the American perspective due to the main character was an American soldier. The story gave from subtle hints to big ones about the feelings that the Americans had to the Chinese and to the Boxers. One of the things that I quickly noticed was that the Chinese Palace was dark and dingy looking. At the opening of the movie, it starts off with all the bands playing there national anthems and they were all celebrating being in China. In the end the Americans and the other countries that were left to fight off the Boxers rejoiced that their reinforcements finally arrived. The story also ends with the defeat of the Boxers and once again all of the bands playing there own national anthems.

The British were trying to protect there trading possessions in China and that is why that they did not want to leave China even though they were the only ones wanting to remain. Under pressures of looking bad the Americans and the other nations stayed to help in the fight against the Boxers. This is probably the way it all unfolded but it once again gave a sense of national pride because the West was going to join together to defeat the foes of the east.

This movie was a good movie and I felt that it showed the views of the era that the film was made. Actually, after watching the film “55 days at Peking” I felt more knowledgeable toward understanding the Boxer rebellion. I felt that the message was very clear about how the West felt about the East at this period of time.

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

This blog is being created where I can post all of my history college papers, research, and projects.

I am a senior at Lubbock Christian University.


The following is an article review that I wrote for my Ancient History Course. The article is titled "The First Genocide: Carthage, 146BC." the article was written by Ben Kiernan and publlished in DIOGENES.

------------

Bobby Montgomery
September 5th 2006



Kiernan, Ben. “The First Genocide: Carthage, 146 BC.” Diogenes 51(no3 2004):27-36

Ben Kiernan wrote this article about the first genocide which took place in 146 BC. In the words of Marcus Porcius Cato “Carthage must be destroyed”. Cato called for the total annihilation of Carthage. Although the majority of Rome agreed with Cato there were still others who wanted to spare Carthage. Take Scipio Nasica the son in law to Scipio Africanus. He often said that ‘Carthage should be allowed to exist’. Even though there was some opposition, the third Punic War was launched just before Cato’s death and this is the war that put an end to Carthage. During the third Punic War, the entire culture of the Carthaginians was destroyed, but not all of the Carthaginians were killed. Some were sold as slaves. Rome was determined to destroy Carthage, its people, and its culture, even after they had surrendered in the 2nd Punic war. This is the reason that Ben Kiernan compares the destruction of Carthage to the 20th century genocide as practiced by the Germans in World War II and has since been outlawed.
Cato wanted the Roman Empire to dominate the world militarily. To Cato, sparing the Carthaginians did not make sense because the Carthaginians were already enemies of Rome. Cato planned to pursue his enemy and to take no prisoners. He killed most all of those that were his enemy. Cato put down many Carthaginian rebellions in Spain, some by force and others through diplomatic negotiations. At age 81 Cato was on a mission into Carthage and he was surprised by the resiliency the Carthaginians showed after they were defeated in the second Punic War and so he had predetermined they had to be destroyed. When he had returned to Rome he let everyone know in the Senate that they must be put down. He did so by using fig leaves and letting them fall on the ground and telling the members of the Senate that the land the leaves came from was only a three day journey by boat from Rome.
The majority of the Senate was farmers and they knew that the fig leaves did not come from Carthage but came from Cato’s garden. The question is then asked if the destruction of Carthage is due to the Carthagenian merchants. Did Rome want to put down the competition in the markets? Cato did not like merchants and thought that they were as bad as murderers or thieves. Cato compares the trader or the merchant with his favorite citizen the farmer in his book entitled ‘De Agri Cultura”. Cato thought that the best soldiers came from the farmers because they are loyal and brave.
Kiernan talked of the wars in his article and he also shared his feelings toward the people, especially his feelings on women. Cato thought that women had to be subdued and kept in check. He thought that women had to be kept in their place and he was not happy with the women being allowed to conduct organized meetings. He did not like to see women have more than a half ounce of gold or wear brightly colored clothing. He also did not like seeing women riding in horse driven buggies. Cato thought that the woman is like an “untamed animal”! He said that sex was a major reason that the slaves acted badly and therefore, he allowed his men slaves to have sex with the women slaves if they paid him. Cato could be considered a hypocrite because after his wife passed away he was frequently visited by a prostitute in private. However, Cato was hard on those that showed public affection such as the Senator who was banished for kissing his own wife in broad daylight. Men were also placed in the spotlight when it came to illicit sexual acts, especially that of homosexuality.
Cato ended his military career in 191 B.C. after Rome was victorious over Greece. He did not want the Roman culture to be jeopardized because of Greece. He believed that the Greek culture of being eccentric threatened the Roman way of life. But Rome was so vast that it seemed impossible to not stray into the Greek culture. After all, Romans were already using terminology from Greek architecture to Greek cosmetics. The majority of Roman historians wrote in Greek but Cato was the first Roman historian to produce a historical work in Latin. His work is now lost but it is said to be a seven volume set telling of the Roman kings, the Punic Wars, and even racial prejudice. That is just to name a few of the topics that these books are talking about. In the days of Cato the Greeks were people that just did not care about the rules. Although he did not like the Greeks in his later period of his life he did, however, learn the Greek language. To Cato, the Greeks and the Carthaginians were both a threat to the Roman way of life. According to some scholars, an attack of Greece was planned but was not ever launched. Any war with Greece would have been a long drawn out war and a difficult war to fight.
Rome ruled in the Mediterranean after the destruction of Carthage but the country was faced with many civil wars. Virgil, a Roman poet, began writing poetry in Latin and wrote of farmers and then finally his imperial epic ‘Aeneid’. ‘Aeneid’ is an irony and it is the telling the story of Dido the founder of Carthage. It talks about how Jupiter subdues the temper of Carthage. It tells of how Carthage was to be destroyed by using centuries of hate between Rome and Carthage while linking them with Troy.
Ben Kiernan wrote of the feelings that Cato held towards Carthage while l through out the article he gave illustrations and examples of Cato’s feelings that correlated with his feelings of Carthage. We got a chance to delve into the feelings that Cato had toward different members of the population of Rome; such as, farmers, merchants and women. We learned of his feelings of public affection and the ways in which his feelings about these different peoples or acts. We even got a chance to learn a little about the Roman literature regarding the Carthaginians and the Punic wars. Cato was a hard man that wanted what he wanted and most of all he wanted to see the annihilation of Carthage and he was able to see that. Cato thought that the spread of Greek culture was a bad thing for Rome and that it must be stopped.



------------